Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Cisco is a great place to work for 25-35 year olds

The company will cash in on your energy, enthusiasm, and optimism. Eventually you will need to move into leadership to have a chance of growing your income. At that point, you will learn to network up, and pass the buck. You will learn a lot being a front line manager, as the company will expose you to all kinds of pressure and problems. But, you will need to move on by the time you are 40, as you will be targeted for redundancy, unless you have attached yourself to a skilled politician rising up through the company. Don't worry, once you get past front line management, you will never again be accountable for anything!

An on point post from @rzl+1bVxh3u0.

by
| 1783 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1bWnHW08

4 replies (most recent on top)

For the price of one you can get two grads. They will do more to prove themselves will have fresh blood to donate and will not expect much. By the time they know Cisco will get rid of them and get a fresh supply.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ucg+1bWnHW08

Question: in the US West coast, which grade level or positions at Cisco are paying total compensation around $300K today? Let’s say $180K base + $120K in RSU+bonus. Do you need to be at grade 13 to earn that?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cyv+1bWnHW08
There will always be companies looking for upper management types even if they never delivered or accomplished anything.

Isn't this in the current job description for any exec at Cisco?

Then again, I thought there was something unwritten in every CxO title role at all companies. CxO's don't just leave a company because it's booming, they leave when there are problems with the company or they're forced out because there's problems with them. Yet, they get huge bonuses to leave and huge bonuses when they start a new role.

CEO's and football/basketball coaches are the only two jobs I know of where a person can fail, get paid off millions of $'s when they're fired, and make more $'s when they're hired somewhere else, and even repeat the cycle again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @coh+1bWnHW08

This is not usually the case. The problem with Cisco is their so called "technology" is outdated. As a result, if a person choose to stay in the technical path, they will find that they don't exactly have transferable skills for the next job. However, as the poster pointed out, if they are a director or above, they are set for life. There will always be companies looking for upper management types even if they never delivered or accomplished anything.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ypa+1bWnHW08

Post a reply

: