What a Sham!
11 replies (most recent on top)
The paradox of tolerance on full display with many of these posts.
Based on my observation and reading the site rule here is what mods usually nuke:
- names or anything personal and identifiable (ok to name c-suits, not ok to name your direct manager or coworker)
- f-words and personal insults, racism, derogatory speech
- politics and religion talk
- advertising posts (meaning: careful with links)
- -off-topics (meaning: if it’s not related to the company and it’s employees, it may be nuked).
They take their cue from their fearful leader where every criticism (and legal action) means they hate the country and a violation of their rights.
Pathetic.
@tvy they are, nobody is violating your 1st amendment rights.
Those posts are violating the rules that you agreed to in order to use this service.
You're basically whining that you're too ignorant to follow the rules and therefore should be allowed to skirt them. It's not a great defense.
OP is a troll. Or didn't you know that?
These people want the government to allow Wells to continue to exploit its customers and employees unchecked, but a private website that doesn't want to host misinformation or unhinged bigoted rants?...that's a bridge too far, bucko
Don't give their political "beliefs" more credit than they deserve: they just parrot whatever their corporate overlords want them to and constantly turn on a dime and contradict themselves. They don't really believe in anything or put thought into moral consistency.
@tvy+1cZPbzZv you can say whatever you want in your own home and kick anyone you want out for saying something you dont like. Why? because you are on property you own and you get to decide what the rules are on your private property if they don't break local, state or federal law. Keep up unless you are saying that you don't want intellectual property and private property rights to apply to you? (i swear qanoners lower the iq everywhere they go)
This site is like Facebook: it's full of misinformed paranoid right wing old people, but I repeat myself.
@vfq where does the 1st Amendment say privately owned, publicly accessible, internet discussion forums are required to let you break their TOS if you feel it's a free speech issue?
It censors liars. There. I fixed it for you.
1A ain't what it used to be.