Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Why don't we get rid of people who were hired in the last 12 months?

Plenty of people were added to EM in the last twelve months, I think more than enough to make a nice dent in the planned reduction numbers. Why doesn't the company get rid of them - they have the least experience and knowledge and will cost the least in the way of severance - instead of fabricating unsatisfactory review results for long-term employees?

by
| 2219 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1cnDuxsI

13 replies (most recent on top)

There is a difference in Unconventional UOG and the rest of UOG. XTO valued experience so managers were usually 20+ years experience people and had a number of very senior technical staff. It is taking awhile for the new performance system to PIP all of them out. Other parts of UOG look like the set of High School Musical!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pcg+1cnDuxsI

@yky+1cnDuxsI Plenty of 60+ in our group within UOG… common excuse is they stay because they want to contribute, what they don’t say is the contribution is for multiple ex wives and bad life choices.
Pre oil crash the ancient annuitants were everywhere, that stopped for the most part however some are starting to creep back in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ebn+1cnDuxsI

Only retain the commodity traders, logistics teams and actuaries.
All this company needs - aside from Executives of course.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hpo+1cnDuxsI

@lef+1cnDuxsI
How many people over 60 do you have around you ? In my larger group (about 60 people) we had one, who’s just retiring. In the same larger group, only two REs left (significantly below 60).
Can you say with a straight face that young people don’t get opportunities because it’s all clogged by those ghostly old people ? All our supervisors, managers and most of the VPs are in their 30s and early 40s. Maybe that’s old to you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yky+1cnDuxsI

A pause in hiring results in a population gap in the workforce generation.

IMO, the company got ahead of itself by overhiring only to lose people left and right through pip/layoff & resignation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qml+1cnDuxsI

I'll give you something salty.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bxi+1cnDuxsI

This is the reason they're able to keep firing good employees who they call NSI.

This is the plan.

Many companies would ki-l for reliable and hard working employees that ExxonMobil calls NSI.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mmh+1cnDuxsI

We hire them so we can fire them to offset the RE we fire in TG's cauldron to keep us out of EEOC trouble as we still have 4+ years of PIPING to go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gbj+1cnDuxsI

They are most likely cheaper, intelligent, resources that will eventually learn the job.

But, once they become expensive, you'll see them posting the same message you posted.

Low cost labor is the ultimate high for corporate machines.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bek+1cnDuxsI

Considering the idiocy of your post I think you make a good candidate for layoff

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ifu+1cnDuxsI

Instead let’s look at those 60+ who refuse to retire and open up positions for the younger talent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lef+1cnDuxsI

Are you really so stupid or you pretend?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lvc+1cnDuxsI

You have to keep putting new blood into the system. Without it you loose oxygen and die. Yes old blood is good as it has iron and minerals in it, but sometimes it gets to salty. You have to put in new oxygen carrying blood to keep the heavy lifting going.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hrb+1cnDuxsI

Post a reply

: