Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM Spinoff Kyndryl Starts Trading. Now It Needs to Figure Out How to Grow.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/kyndryl-stock-ticker-trading-ibm-spinoff-51635974660

Late Wednesday, IBM completed its long-planned spinoff of Kyndryl, the company’s sprawling managed IT services company. IBM investors largely view the deal as addition by subtraction—pulling out the low-margin, shrinking services arm should put IBM on a path to mid-single-digit revenue growth for the first time in a decade.

But don’t ignore Kyndryl, which instantly becomes the largest publicly-held pure-play bet on IT services. Its stock will start trading on Thursday.

“We start life as a $19 billion start-up,” Kyndryl (ticker: KD) CEO Martin Schroeter said in an interview with Barron’s. “We’re the leading infrastructure services company. We start in an enviable position. We’re the biggest player in the industry, our customers really trust us, and they really like the work we’re doing.”

Kyndryl has 90,000 employees, competing largely with India-based IT outsourcers like Wipro and Tata Consultancy Services , and serving some of the world’s largest companies. Schroeter says customers are excited about Kyndryl’s status as a public company.

“They saw there had been underinvestment,” Schroeter says. “They would like us to build new, more expansive capabilities, and they’d like us to be a participants in more of the market ecosystem, as opposed to the narrowly focused IBM (IBM) ecosystem.”

That said, Kyndryl has some financial challenges to overcome, and its valuation is likely to be modest. Revenue in 2020 on an adjusted basis was $19.1 billion, and has been shrinking in recent years—in part a reflection that companies are shifting more workloads off proprietary systems and into the public cloud.

For 2021, Kyndryl estimates revenue will be in the range of $18.5 billion to $18.7 billion. The company expects 2021 adjusted Ebitda, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, of between $2.8 billion and $2.9 billion, about flat with the $2.9 billion reported on a pro forma basis in 2020, with pretax income in the $100 million to $200 million range.

Schroeter concedes that the big question for Kyndryl is how to get the company to grow in a market he estimates at $240 billion. He acknowledges the company has been particularly focused on parts of the market that have been shrinking—software running in on-premises environments, rather than public cloud. He expects the company to build new capabilities to help clients shift their work to Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud, while adding new capabilities in networking, security, data management, and artificial intelligence.

“You are taking the biggest player in the space, with trusted relationships, and a deep, deep core of experts around the planet, and essentially unleashing it, both with some investment, to create new things and new capabilities,” the CEO adds.

Kyndryl Chief Financial Officer David Wyshner says the company expects to keep shrinking for a few more years as it builds out new capabilities, targeting revenue growth in 2025. To him, the past track record isn’t that relevant—much like the Tampa Bay Buccaneers before they signed Tom Brady—who had won six Super Bowls by that point—to be quarterback.

“It was a different organization, which did not have a game plan to operate in a broader ecosystem,” he says. But unlike the Bucs and Brady, this situation is not going to change overnight. “The selling cycle is long,” Wyshner says. “But the mission is changing on day one, and our ability to invest changes on day one.”

The company will start with modest leverage, about $1 billion in net debt, leaving Kyndryl “some capacity to think about M&A” to add to its capabilities, Martin says. Asked about how the Street is likely to value the business, the CEO says that over time, investors should come to appreciate that Kyndryl is “the leading player in the space, with a new freedom to grow.” Eventually, he says, the stock should trade at a premium to others in the services sector.

But that’s not likely to be the case at first. Kyndryl won’t initially pay a dividend, which might spur the army of retail investors who own IBM for its fat 5.2% yield to unload the stock—and, as noted, the company is facing several more years of shrinking revenue. On Wednesday, in thin when-issued trading, Kyndryl was trading for about $30 a share, giving the company a market cap of about $6.7 billion. While Kyndryl will start life with about a quarter of legacy IBM’s revenue, the valuation will be just 6% of the pre-spin market cap.

by
| 1684 views | | 2 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1dEZnD70

2 replies (most recent on top)

A decade ago, Wall Street valued IBM and Microsoft at just over $200bn each. Since
then, IBM’s value has slipped by nearly half, while Microsoft earlier this week overtook
Apple to become the world’s most valuable public company, at more than $2.5tr.

Just one of the many d@mning facts in this article.

https://www.ft.com/content/ded67317-682d-4cd9-8e41-fc72646dee12

IBM sheds 25% of its business in battle against decade of decline --

IBM has completed the spin-off of the IT services business that once brought it back from the edge of bankruptcy, in its most drastic move yet to end a decade-long contraction that has eroded confidence among Wall Street investors and customers.

Shares in the newly independent services business, renamed Kyndryl, are set to start trading on Wall Street on Thursday, carving out a business that generated more than a quarter of IBM’s $73.6bn revenue last year.

IBM’s IT services business was built by then-CEO Lou Gerstner after the company came close to financial disaster in the early 1990s. Gerstner, a former private equity executive, bet that building and maintaining, or in some cases running, IT systems for customers would generate extra revenue and boost sales of IBM products such as its mainframe computers.

However, the services division has waned in recent years as IBM’s customers have shifted more of their computing to the public clouds run by Amazon and Microsoft and an ageing portfolio of software products built for an earlier computing era has failed to support the company’s growth.

IBM is hoping that shedding Kyndryl, whose revenue is expected to fall by 6 per cent this year, will put a decade of contraction behind it. Big Blue’s revenue has fallen every year since 2011, except for one year when it grew less than 1 per cent. The spin-off will leave the company with about half the $107bn in annual sales it had at its peak in 2011.

“There are markets we put a lot of money in that didn’t work out,” Arvind Krishna, IBM’s chief executive officer, said of its contraction. Speaking in a recent interview with the Financial Times, he added that the company’s problem “wasn’t a lack of investment”. “It’s execution.”

The retreat included failed bets on some of the biggest new markets in IT. Chief among them was cloud computing, where the acquisition of a small cloud business eight years brought IBM an operation that was unable to serve the needs of the large corporations and governments that are its core customers.

Trying to channel customers into using IBM’s small in-house cloud division, at a time when the market was swinging to bigger cloud players, was one reason why IBM’s giant IT services business found itself trapped in a shrinking market, said Martin Schroeter, the former IBM chief financial officer who is now CEO of Kyndryl.

Cutting the services business free of IBM would enable it to forge partnerships with the leading cloud companies and give it a new shot at markets that are growing, he added. Kyndryl hoped to “stabilise” its business by 2025, ending its revenue contraction and positioning it to start growing again, Schroeter said.

Meanwhile, Krishna is betting that a simplified structure, along with better execution, will finally put the remaining IBM business back on a sustainable growth path. The changes since he took over as chief executive last year have included stripping IBM’s investments back to a smaller number of priorities, such as artificial intelligence and security, and bringing in new remuneration arrangements for the company’s sales force to promote purchases of its newer software products.

The declining relevance of IBM’s portfolio of technologies has removed it from the central place it once enjoyed among IT buyers, who were long said to operate on the principle that “you never get fired for buying IBM”. A recent survey of buying intentions by corporate chief investments officers showed that they were planning to direct an even lower share of their IT spending to IBM across its different businesses, according to a note from Katy Huberty, an analyst at Morgan Stanley.

A decade ago, Wall Street valued IBM and Microsoft at just over $200bn each. Since then, IBM’s value has slipped by nearly half, while Microsoft earlier this week overtook Apple to become the world’s most valuable public company, at more than $2.5tr.

Microsoft’s huge swing in fortunes showed how the software company had taken over the central role in IT once held by IBM, said David Thacker, a former Google cloud executive and now a venture capitalist at Greylock. He said the mantra among IT buyers these days was: “You don’t get fired for buying from Microsoft.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mjr+1dEZnD70

Needs to break away from all the horrible IBM tools/processes.
If that does not happen then they're doomed IMO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dxq+1dEZnD70

Post a reply

: