Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Pre-print study linking Myocarditis to covid vaccine has been retracted

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-preprint-myocarditiswithdrawn-idUSL1N2QX1WS?fbclid=IwAR1dmXwmYUblmpJI_CDiYVLgaNwc3Za4ZEZ85oJiaTRpnh2tTUcbh2ip9Wg

Correction Oct. 4: corrects spelling of denominator in paragraph 13, and in the same paragraph corrects “25 orders of magnitude off” to “25 times smaller”. Changes ‘magnitude’ to ‘factor’ in verdict.

A pre-print study which claimed that there is a 1 in 1,000 risk of contracting a heart inflammation condition known as myocarditis has since been retracted due to a calculation.

The study which was conducted by researchers at The University of Ottawa Heart Institute, was featured in numerous blogs and social media posts as proof that the COVID-19 vaccine is unsafe for use.

“New Study Shows 1 in 1000 Develop Heart Inflammation After Covid Vaccination; Myocarditis and Other Related Heart Conditions Have Increased Death Rate Within 5 Years,” the headline of an article published on September 21 on The Gateway Pundit reads ( archive.is/t0XC3 ).

Examples of the claim shared on social media are viewable ( here ), ( here ), and ( here ).

Other links to blogs referencing the retracted study can be found ( archive.is/wip/aZzjV ) and ( archive.is/Lxnl2 ).

The study was first published on September 16 on the platform MedRxiv, a website that publishes studies that have yet to be peer-reviewed ( here ).

Studies go through a process known as peer-review where experts in a specific field analyze the piece to ensure its accuracy and to assess that it is of high academic standard ( here ), ( emory.libanswers.com/faq/24265 ).

The pre-print paper that has since been retracted is viewable in full ( archive.is/pvggn ).

The study had calculated an incidence rate of myocarditis in the Ottawa region post-vaccination by dividing the number of occurrences of the heart inflammation condition over a two-month period (June and July 2021) in Ottawa (32) by the total number of vaccinations in the area (reported as 32,379 in the pre-print).

The incidence rate of myocarditis, using these figures, equates to 10 for every 10,000 doses of the vaccine.

The pre-print paper had used an incorrect figure for the number of doses administered in Ottawa over that two-month period, however.

Between the week beginning May 30 and the week starting July 25, there had been 845,930 vaccines administered in the Ottawa region, according to data published by Ottawa Public Health, which is far greater than the figure used to calculate the incidence rate (32,379) ( here ).

The denominator (total vaccines administered over a two-month period in Ottawa) used to calculate the incidence rate of myocarditis in the pre-print study was approximately 25 times smaller than the correct figure.

The study was then withdrawn on September 24 and in a statement the researchers said: "Our reported incidence appeared vastly inflated by an incorrectly small denominator (ie number of doses administered over the time period of the study). We reviewed the data available at Open Ottawa and found that there had indeed been a major underestimation, with the actual number of administered doses being more than 800,000 (much higher than quoted in the paper)” ( archive.is/UCKQK ).

“In order to avoid misleading either colleagues or the general public and press, we the authors unanimously wish to withdraw this paper on the grounds of incorrect incidence data,” they added.

The University of Ottawa Heart Institute released a statement saying that they were “sorry this error led to misinformation about the incidence of post-vaccine myocarditis” ( archive.is/wip/wJUnt ).

Meanwhile, numerous blog posts that reported on the study did not issue an update on these blogs regarding the retraction, nor did they mention that this study was a pre-print that had not been reviewed.

In response to the retracted pre-print, a spokesperson for the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) sent Reuters a study released on September 3 which monitored adverse events following mRNA vaccines between December 14, 2020, and June 26, 2021, with data from Vaccine Safety Datalink. ( here ).

“Analyses of all ages combined did not detect a significant association between myocarditis/pericarditis and mRNA vaccines,” the report noted, although adding that there was evidence of “an association between mRNA vaccines and myocarditis/pericarditis in younger individuals”.

The latest CDC guidance states that young men are at greater risk of getting myocarditis after the second dose of an mRNA vaccine, although the benefits of the vaccine still outweigh risks ( here ).
VERDICT

Missing Context. A Canadian study had found that the incidence rate of myocarditis is 1 in 1,000 following an mRNA vaccine. The study has since been retracted due to an error making the above calculation, where the denominator was incorrect by a factor of roughly 25.

by
| 1966 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1dNmqSf8

11 replies (most recent on top)

This is a layoff board not a Covid one. I’m interested in the stability of my job. Go away.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kct+1dNmqSf8

so the qanoners have arrived and are mad that their antivax spam has been disproven.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bsr+1dNmqSf8

Oh, I am so sorry.

Didn't you realize this has morphed into a WF b*tch board and vaccine scare site?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yvo+1dNmqSf8

I wish this non-related stuff would get removed. It has zero t do with the board here...aka Wells Fargo Layoffs...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xvb+1dNmqSf8

@1kxj+1dNmqSf8, you're an id--t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vxt+1dNmqSf8

Post ID: @1kxj+1dNmqSf8

Take off the tinfoil hat and relax a bit. I'm sure your friends and family will appreciate it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wsk+1dNmqSf8

@1bvf+1dNmqSf8 the ones who benefit from COVID not ending are politicians currently in power and desire to stay in power. They want to control the populous. Be good little soldiers, stay in our homes, wear masks (even though they don't, off camera) , vax (even though they don't) and while we get scared of COVID they try to force huge tax bills on us and claim only the rich will get higher taxes. All the while costs have skyrocketed. They are using COVID as the vehicle, the excuse, to push this on the American people. By the way, it is the party in power that wants to stay in power and is currently pulling off this trick on the populous.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kxj+1dNmqSf8

Some folks don't want the pandemic to end so they can use it against 46 in the next election.

Other folks are just weirdos.

And none of this has anything to do with layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bvf+1dNmqSf8

For those who don't want to get vaxxed, don't. For those who do, do. There is evidence on both sides for and against the vax. I am not a vax n_zi nor do I admire them in any way. Peace.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hdm+1dNmqSf8

More trolling I see. I think we've beat the vaccine thing to death already.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ici+1dNmqSf8

I'm pro vaccine, but what does this have to do with layoffs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nnl+1dNmqSf8

Post a reply

: