Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

SA Cost Cutting Continues

SA cost cutting continues. Aside from many SA positions not being backfilled, there is more emphasis on using C2E and Agile TSA to reduce the number of SAs. The SA leadership is moving forward with more SA cuts. This will take on various forms such as attrition / not back filling reqs to performance based cuts. The reason for the cuts is simply there is less products that can be sold. The SE / SA Opex is out of control. The cost per SA is extremely high and it is unsustainable. The cuts so far have not achieved a reasonable Opex number so further efficiencies are needed. This is how EK and the SEDs are going to justify C2E and Agile TSA to everyone to include the savings it can provide by reducing cost per SA.

Some questions you should be asking your engineering leadership.

Why has Cisco stopped believing in technical relationships with customers.

Is it true that Engineering needs to reduce cost per SA / SE.

Why is there a lack of transparency and an unwillingness to answer the tough questions by engineering leadership.

Why are our competitors paying more and willing to invest in their pre-sales engineers and Cisco is taking more away.

Why are all the efficiencies (cutting SAs) happening at the IC level and not at management/ leadership levels.

by
| 2821 views | | 14 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1dbL4lJk

14 replies (most recent on top)

We are moving to the Salesforce account model. I wonder how?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5lkz+1dbL4lJk

All SAs and TSAs are going to a specialization and Agile TSA. You will not be architects no longer. You will see in FY23.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5wuh+1dbL4lJk

C2E and Agile TSA are a disaster. We have lost many deals to this. There are no technical relationships any more. Customers want more than what they are getting with C2E and Agile TSA.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xsk+1dbL4lJk
Meraki is growing and the rest of Cisco is not.

Completely false as any look at our recent numbers would confirm

Is it true that Engineering needs to reduce cost per SA / SE.

What has the role of SE/SA to do with engineering? It’s a sales function!!
TMEs and Engineers work for engineering, SEs work for sales.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1epz+1dbL4lJk

C2E only benefits Leadership. It does not benefit SAs, TSAs, or customers. SAs will no longer be architects. When leadership specializes you they are making you one dimensional and diminishing your value. This is all by design. Once they do that, they can pay those SAs and TSAs less.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nbm+1dbL4lJk

C2E Is the tool for metrics tracking. Some SAs will not be pooled meaning they will stay in their Region and AMs will have to request an SA for their region via C2E. SAs in the C2E will be specialized in the region.

Agile TSA is for the pooling of SAs. Other SAs will be pooled either by Operation or Area level depending on their specialty. Expect this to be your SE4s where there are very few. C2E tool will be used to request pooled Operations and Area wide SAs.

Meraki SEs will not be in this as the Meraki leadership has the guts to push back on C2E and Agile TSA. Meraki is growing and the rest of Cisco is not. C2E and Agile TSA is for non-high growth portfolio which is most of Cisco’s portfolio. Kudos to Meraki for pushing back.

SAs, ask your leadership why Meraki is not doing C2E and Agile TSA.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1orv+1dbL4lJk

This sounds great to me, but then again I’m technical. I think the people that don’t like this like the BS politics, salesy stuff, etc. I’m glad that’ll be cut out of my job but you guys must love that stuff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bil+1dbL4lJk

C2E is Click to Exit. I’m outta here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1htn+1dbL4lJk

“Some SAs will goto C2E and other SAs will goto Agile TSA.”

That doesn’t make any sense C2E is how you reach someone from Agile TSA.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hyl+1dbL4lJk

Agree with OP. I wound encourage SAs to ask questions of your leadership. Ask them in writing, I guarantee you that no SA leader, SED will respond in writing. They are not going to deny this in writing. They will rather tell you that they want to “have a discussion” so they can dance around the questions and deflect from the actual questions. SA leadership has been instructed to not answer in writing these types questions around SAs going to C2E and Agile TSA. Why do you think that is. Don’t take my word but try asking these types of questions and see the response you get back. No FUD here and it will be confirmed by SA leaders and SEDs due to their unwillingness to answer questions via email and tell you “let’s have a discussion”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uoh+1dbL4lJk

SAs are moving to C2E and Agile TSA. Some SAs will goto C2E and other SAs will goto Agile TSA. It is going to happen. SAs need to be aware and make decisions that are best for their career. If you don’t want a career then C2E and Agile TSA will be best for you. I like the questions by the OP. There has been such a lack of transparency by leadership cause they know SAs don’t like this and they know it is career limiting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pkd+1dbL4lJk

WOW - my experience at Cisco has been completely different. I find the work life balance fairly reasonable and I continue to get rewarded with ipf and rsu grants. Could it be...that maybe your not the rockstar employee you claim to be?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cby+1dbL4lJk

You mean “ The cost per AM is extremely high and it is unsustainable.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zzv+1dbL4lJk

If SAs are underpaid, what is driving Opex costs per SA out of control?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tas+1dbL4lJk

Post a reply

: