I have to wonder why Honeywell even has doctors on staff if all they do is parrot the CDC. Shouldn't the point of having your own medical staff be to evaluate ALL of the studies and data and draw their own conclusions? And haven't they seen by now how wrong the CDC is or has been about almost everything?
13 replies (most recent on top)
Honeywell has a fine of $160M for bribery from the feds. They will get a reduced fine if they can get >95% vaccinated. That is why they are not accepting religious exemptions. They must reach the goal to get the discount. Don’t believe me? Look it up!
Honeywell has them so they can deny your medical exemption.
Who knew Honeywell had so many employees that know more about medicine than actual doctors. Probably only making a fraction of what the doctor makes too.
I've been saying this from the beginning. Clown doctors. And they are dangerous for promoting their garbage. People have legitimate questions and concerns and the answer is always, take the jab! Imbeciles.
@1qru+1dq3VTY2 - Source please.
Why Does Honeywell Employ Doctors?"
They are basically paid shills. Their mission is to beat the drum that the Covid vaccines are "safe and effective", have insignificant side effects with near zero risk to your general health, and to get yours as soon as possible. Any information or discussion outside this narrative is generally downplayed.
If you have listened to any of the ongoing "Doctor Calls", that is the basic underlying message.
I think you meant 80% effective for a good cloth mask. A good cloth mask can be 60-80% effective at blocking virus particles. If you wear 2 it would be 96% effective. A 60% effective mask would be 84% effective if you wear 2 of them. Being double masked and fully vaccinated is excellent protection. Remember that the Delta variant results in 1000X more virus particles shooting out of your nose if you sneeze. I would suggest vaccination and double masking. The new Delta Plus (AY.4.2) variant is on it's way just in time for Christmas. It seems to be getting traction in the UK and may be also in Russia. Also, no one knows how much more contagious the virus gets at lower temperatures and humidity, but the original classic version of Covid-19 seemed to test out at up to 7X more infectious under certain temp/humidity conditions. Think of your vaccination as your AR-15 and your mask as your favorite handy side arm. Both can keep you safe!
If history has taught us anything... It's time to stand up, start a revolution and call out of work!!
The doctors aren’t even American doctors
Let’s think through the following.
"Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period."
- Michael Crichton
Do you understand?
A Honeywell doctor is unlikely to provide a scientific fact if he knows that he will lose his job or be sent to a reeducation gulag. Next, let's explore the consensus for bloodletting.
The OP is right. Cloth masks is one example where the best study shows a 20% reduction of transmission in best case scenario (properly fitted, no removal for eating and drinking, etc) and the worst shows no reduction. The docs could take one of two approaches: recommend rules to ensure proper fit of masks (i.e., all people with facial hair must shave and no eating), or they could arrive at a perfectly logical and correct conclusion that as-implemented at Honeywell, masks are essentially useless and are probably doing more harm than good. Yet the doctors blindly parrot whatever the CDC says. Wish I had a job where all I had to do was parrot someone else's recommendations.
The OP is an example of what happens when you subject people to mistruths over and over and over and over.
They repeat the mistruths and eventually come to believe the mistruths.
Let’s think through the following.
Scientific work/findings is subject to peer review. Right. Many subject matter experts review and discuss scientific findings. Many times the interpretation of the findings is revised to achieve a consensus among the subject matter experts.
This same process is used in heavily engineered products. For example, flight control systems, propulsion engines, etc.
This is why the doctors Honeywell employees (and the majority of doctors around the world) will most likely agree with the consensus outcome of the CDC.
Do you understand?
A Honeywell doctor is unlikely to provide an exemption without a legitimate basis.