Thread regarding Fiserv Inc. layoffs

"Covid is a scam"

Says the Hannanite who can supply not one scintilla of credible evidence to support this position.

Easily verifable facts for the person who somehow beleives that after two years the vaccines for Covuid are equivalent to the German experiments or the Tuskegee experiments

The unvaccinated are

• unnecessarily dying at a rate 14 times higher than the unvaccinated
• unnecessarily flooding the ICUs at rates 700 percent higher than the unvaccinated
• unnecessarily costing employers and the government BILLIONS and BILLIONS in

unnecessary hospital costs and lost productivity

• two to three times more likely to infect others

Additionally

• about 9 BILLION vaccinations globally and 500 MILLION in the USA have been administered making the claim that the vaccines are "experimental" humorous at face level.
• Surgical and K/N95 masks, when worn properly, greatly reduce the spread of Covid and other virus borne diseases

Lastly, you are not required to be vaccinated. You have that freedom. Your employer is not required to retain your employment if you are not vaccinated. They have that freedom. See what what happens when unions are destroyed and "at will" employment is the law of the land?

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996.
Introduction
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is

a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. Theexperimentshouldbesodesignedandbasedontheresultsofanimal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. Theexperimentshouldbeconductedonlybyscientificallyqualifiedpersons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. Duringthecourseoftheexperimentthehumansubjectshouldbeatlibertyto bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

I'm so happy I left mid November. I stop in here from time to time hoping things have changed or have at least improved a bit. I see that it hasn't. I don't miss the BS at all, I do miss my team though. New gig is less stress, WFH full time. Wishing everyone a better 2022. Might be time to cut your loses and leave.

I was a new hire. VP level, started during the pandemic. The toxicity was unbearable. Tried to get through it for the sake of my 100+ member team. Thought I'd stay for the 2 year mark so I wouldn't have to pay back my signing bonus but just couldn't bear it anymore. Wrote the check back with a flourish when I left. Good riddance to bad rubbish. They didn't waste even 1 business day in sending me the letter demanding their money back, and cashed the check the same day it was delivered to corporate office. Now if only they tried to be half as efficient in anything other than greed.

Glad I left when I did. Working 100% remote, still unvaxed, and loving it.

Frank doesn't know how to run a company. First Data was deep in debt and basically on the brink of failures, and now all of that mess has been brought to Fiserv. Nice one, Frank. Shame on you.