Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM Needs to Go Small

The synergistic additional revenue from software providers / businesses that have been lumped together over decades through mergers and aqcuisitions, and sold as a collection of loose bolts to be assembled by a bunch of expensive consultants may no longer be an appropriate model.

Being slow as molasses and expensive as he-l with a large amount of doubt over the final performance of the solution(s) sold sprinkled all over the customer(s) is not a good position to be in. Customers want to buy /lease leapfrog type technology and functionality and eliminate redundancy and write-offs in their IT and Operations budgets.

They too can no longer afford such unwanted expenses. IBM needs to go small. Break up the company and create several buckets ie businesses and eliminate the " grow the size of the order and lock the customer in" as their main objective. That is exactly everything the customer does NOT want. Think about that!

by
| 1914 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1eRtjkqm

3 replies (most recent on top)

IBM will never go small Their fixed overhead drives them toward bigger deals. Remember smaller transactions only drive 10-15% of IBM’s revenue. (8-% AK’s plan is to exploit the 85% of revenue Why? Because that’s where you get the most income from the resources expended. The channel exists for the lower/smaller transactions, because IBM can’t afford to play there. When the transactional cost is approx the same regardless of its size, folks always migrate towards the higher end. That’s what a revenue pay plan drives towards. Reps are coin operated and their pay pay plan drives behavior

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2aig+1eRtjkqm

That will never happen... the Execs are not interested in growing a brain, they are only in this for the money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eml+1eRtjkqm

Several good points. IBM goes small irrespective of whether they break up or not. Very sad to witness.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fao+1eRtjkqm

Post a reply

: