Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Twice per week testing now!

Starting Jan 3rd or within the first 7 days of your specific RTO. Rapid tests being sent to home address. Yet, 100% of the population could be carriers.

by
| 2913 views | | 31 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1eexOe4M

31 replies (most recent on top)

@2hjx+1eexOe4M
VAERS isn't reliable as a source. Its un-investigated reports.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3bwr+1eexOe4M

1elb+1eexOe4M is right. Go out and download the VEARS data. You will get to see all the FACTS MSM and politician's on all aisles are hiding from us. Better yet, go look for real news in Finland, Sweden, Switzerland and you will learn more in 1 day than 2 yrs of covid

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hjx+1eexOe4M

One of the biggest problems here is the timing. Let's say an "unvaxed" person decides to get the first shot. They are still considered "unvaxed" and have to wait a month to receive the follow-up vax. Soon they will announce the (first) booster is needed to be considered vaxed. That cannot happen until six months AFTER the second shot. So now we will be talking EIGHT MONTHS (you have to wait two weeks after the (first) booster) to be considered fully vaccinated. This will be ongoing for the foreseeable future and more and more people will fall into the "not fully vaxed" category. Testing will eventually be in EVERYONE's future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dyc+1eexOe4M

Doctor FaceBook must not have any real patients because he/she/they post anti-science nonsense here multiple times a day.

And then they have time to refresh their browser over and over to game the points ratings.

Must be a good life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1itr+1eexOe4M

@1fim+1eexOe4M

There's no evidence that Delta is deadlier than previous strains. It might even be less so--that would follow the pattern of such diseases where more contagious but less lethal variants win the evolutionary battle for supremacy. Kind of like Omicron, seems to be super contagious but also extremely mild. The global number of fatalities for that variant still sits at zero. I'm sure the media is chomping at the bit to report on the first instance, but for now Omicron looks almost like it's a natural vaccine. Exposes people to what appears to be a safe virus, which builds immunity through the production of antibodies which may also be effective against other variants.

In any case, those most at risk are fully vaccinated in very high percentages, treatment protocols are better than ever, and yet deaths are up. That doesn't make sense if one is supposed to believe the "effective" mantra. Let's not forget that pharma says their dr-gs ARE "highly effective" for Delta. The studies look like they came from big tabbaco, but hey, they say it's true in tv so it must be.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dng+1eexOe4M

Post ID: @1fim+1eexOe4M

It was the Deltas against the rules... the rules lost!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uyx+1eexOe4M

@1tji+1eexOe4M

one word: delta

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fim+1eexOe4M

@1elb+1eexOe4M

Why is this so hard for you clowns? The FOIA request was for 329,000 pages of information that included personally identifiable information of over 40,000 people, all of which needs to be redacted.

Courts have established 500 pages a month is a good response rate for FOIA requests.

The requestor could refine their inquiry to speed it up, but they love the non-thinking tards who eat up conspiracies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ijj+1eexOe4M

@1opq+1eexOe4M

That's pretty funny. Which side is saying "we won't release the EUA data for 75 years", even after court-ordered to do so? That would be the vax alliance. Sweet immunity deals from any liability / responsibility for pharma, which they paid politicians to provide. You won't be able to sue the government either, even if they mandate / coerce you. There is zero integrity from the governments or corporations behind this. They've made secret deals and established secret protocols that us pleebs aren't allowed to see. Why not? They have massive amounts of safety data that they are fighting to keep secret in the courts, fighting release tooth and nail every step of the way. Is that integrity? Transparency? How on Earth is informed consent even possible with such secrecy? It's not, and no one can or will be held to account for it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1elb+1eexOe4M

Compare a chart of vaccination in the US vs COVID deaths in the US. In late March we had about 9% fully vaccinated and a 7 day rolling average of 1000 deaths/day. Fast forward to today. You've vaccinated 150,000,000 people during that time. The benefit? Deaths from COVID are up to about 1300/day. They can roll out all the "99% of people in the hospital are unvaccinated!!" stats all they want, at some point the numbers do not add up. The problem here is that it has yet to be proven that Delta is more deadly that previous strains. Inconclusive so far, few studies and they've gone both ways. In any event, the smaller the unvaccinated / no natural immunity / over age 30 group gets, the less likely that it is solely responsible for the reported numbers we are seeing. At some point there's just not enough of them to explain it. Maybe this is why even the ultra-pro vax publication, The Atlantic, is starting to ask questions.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/620953/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tji+1eexOe4M

@exr+1eexOe4M

Heavy emphasis on "from COVID". Young healthy people may be at more risk from the treatments than the disease.

It's funny. You vaccinate 60% of the population. Another 20-30% are impervious due to natural immunity or age/health, and deaths are STILL higher than the year when 0% were vaccinated, even though treatment protocols have got dramatically better over that time. At SOME point, people start to question the narrative because the math does not add up and it gets less believable with every single injection.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qev+1eexOe4M

Yeah exactly, if your safety plan relies on the honesty of antivaxxers...hoo boy

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1opq+1eexOe4M

unless someone is actually watching you test you can just say it's negative and even if you end up causing an outbreak you can say it was a false negative. either way this is just a pointless waste of time and money and will not make us any more safe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hva+1eexOe4M

It'll be interesting, that's for sure. what's to stop me from swabbing my girlfriend's nose, a positive case, or even up my *ss?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ohh+1eexOe4M

and who is watching you take the test and do you have to submit a photo of the results or just indicate you took the test under penalty of purgery? this is just another episode of COVID theatre

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qle+1eexOe4M

For the person wondering who haven’t seen the email: People who selected no to the vaccination question, or who didn’t complete their status through the vaccination portal, received an email today. The email requires the person to test twice weekly (recommended Mondays and Wednesdays). Testing kits will be mailed to said individuals. Testing needs to commence 7 days before return to office. The results need to be entered on a site that will go live January 3rd.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zcp+1eexOe4M

@1sbc+1eexOe4M

It is time for you to step away from the keyboard. Your mind is addled by too many conspiracy theories.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1urc+1eexOe4M

They want people with an increasing number of jabs because it shows compliance, subservience, and a lack of thinking for oneself. Enjoy it while it lasts because the Great Reset will see the adoption of central bank digital currencies and then there’s essentially no function for a bank like WF. The Fed will cut out the middlemen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sbc+1eexOe4M

On PTO with no access to emails.

Where was it announced that unvaccinated WF employees will be subject to 2x a week covid-19 testing? How will the test results be verified?

Note: I don't buy the notion that testing is designed to reduce head count. WF can lay folks off whenever it wishes, testing or not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vqj+1eexOe4M

Just a friendly reminder that the final variant will be called communism.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sxi+1eexOe4M

Biden’s requirement is only once a week. This is absolutely designed to push people out.
Let the work slowdown begin.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wpo+1eexOe4M

Teamworks was updated to now say twice-weekly testing for unvaccinated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tzv+1eexOe4M

@sse. ldl0t

It’s clear right now who is “dead wood.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sag+1eexOe4M

My fellow Americans, unless you have experience dealing with a pandemic, please do not share your "thoughts".

Spoiler, you do not have experience with a pandemic.

Pandemics are an ongoing problem, we learn more every day.

And for businesses wanting people to return to work, while I feel it's a bad idea, it's double the problem, because not only do they need to keep up on the science as it learns more about variants and patterns of transmission, they have to deal with legal issues and unhappy employees.

Not that WF cares about employees.

Happy Holiday's everyone!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ybc+1eexOe4M

Did I miss something? I didn't get notification of any changes today. That being said I am vaccinated and have an ongoing medical accommodation so maybe I just wasn't notified.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wpb+1eexOe4M

If it's not obvious yet, the unvaxed are the "dead wood" that was referred to in another post. It will become even clearer soon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sse+1eexOe4M

(Sigh)…Here come the pro-vaxxers….🙄

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zzg+1eexOe4M

So you're saying between Jan 3rd and Jan 10th will be the layoff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lts+1eexOe4M

Interesting how it changed from once a week to twice a week. Employee Relations is still working through accommodation requests.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dqp+1eexOe4M

Yet unvaccinated--including those that have recovered from Covid--are still 5x more likely to suffer from symptomatic Covid, 13x more likely to die, and spread Covid more easily and for longer periods than the fully vaccinated. If you haven't got the message yet, WF wants you to get vaxxed or quit...as do most of your vaccinated coworkers. What better litmus test for empathy and critical thinking?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @exr+1eexOe4M

Now, if an employee gets COVID from an UNvaccinated co-worker, they can sue Wells Fargo for failure to test them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wru+1eexOe4M

Post a reply

: