Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

ExxonMobil unveils plans for H2 production, CCS at Baytown complex

March 02, 2022
Source: Gulf Energy

The company is planning a hydrogen production plant and one of the world’s largest CCS projects at its integrated refining and petrochemical site at Baytown, Texas, supporting efforts to reduce emissions from company operations and local industry.

“Hydrogen has the potential to significantly reduce CO2 emissions in vital sectors of the economy and create valuable, lower-emissions products that support modern life,” said Joe Blommaert, president of ExxonMobil Low Carbon Solutions. “By helping to activate new markets for hydrogen and carbon capture and storage, this project can play an important part in achieving America’s lower-emissions aspirations.”

The proposed hydrogen facility would produce up to 1 Bft3/d of blue hydrogen. The carbon capture infrastructure for this project would have the capacity to transport and store up to 10 MM metric tpy of CO2, more than doubling ExxonMobil’s current capacity.

Using hydrogen as a fuel at the Baytown olefins plant could reduce the integrated complex’s Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions by up to 30%, supporting ExxonMobil’s ambition to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions from its operated assets by 2050. It also would enable the site to manufacture lower-emissions products for its customers. Access to surplus hydrogen and CO2 storage capacity would be made available to nearby industry.

The project would form ExxonMobil’s initial contribution to a broad, cross-industry effort to establish a Houston carbon capture and storage hub with an initial target of about 50 MM metric tpy of CO2 by 2030, and 100 MM metric t by 2040. Evaluation and planning for the Baytown project are ongoing and, subject to stakeholder support, regulatory permitting and market conditions, a final investment decision is expected in two to three years.

ExxonMobil Low Carbon Solutions business was established to commercialize low-emission technologies and is focusing on carbon capture and storage, hydrogen and biofuels – technologies where the company can leverage its core competencies and competitive advantages. Over the next six years, the company plans to invest more than $15 B on lower-emission initiatives and could increase investments with advancements in policy and technology.

Sound government policies will accelerate the deployment of key technologies at the pace and scale required to support a societal net-zero future. Predictable, stable, cost-effective policies are necessary to incentivize the development and scalability of a wide range of low-emission technologies, including hydrogen and CCS. ExxonMobil continues to support an explicit price on carbon to establish consistent incentives and encourage investments.

by
| 1987 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1fCwaSHZ

9 replies (most recent on top)

Folks, new twist - Exxon CEO: Federal policy changes needed to make Houston CCS hub reality (could cost $100B to build) = a freak show.
https://www.bizjournals.com/houston/news/2022/03/08/45q-tax-credit-ccs-ceraweek-exxon-ceo-darren-woods.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rhp+1fCwaSHZ

This is a stupid PR stunt. Burning NG to make and transport Hydrogen and then capture and store the CO2 with all of its associated emissions and costs. Leave Hydrogen production to the experts. Focus on revamping existing facilities with lower emissions technologies. Support Green Hydrogen development funding.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2atk+1fCwaSHZ

You capture 1.5x the amount of CO2 that you abate. You capture 95% of the CO2: not sure of the upstream emissions but there are lots of academic articles on that. Some are controversial and state quite a lot of emissions upstream.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pam+1fCwaSHZ

Let's do the math. It "burns" fossil fuel (NG) to produce H2, and, CO2. It captures/stores CO2. H2 provides negative emission. What is the energy input in all of this? Anyone understands the complete LCA scenario?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vzl+1fCwaSHZ

NG price is skyrocketing. Brilliant decision! Not a moment too soon. LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ybe+1fCwaSHZ

New “commitments..”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @coc+1fCwaSHZ

O&A isn't union

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qoz+1fCwaSHZ

@dyq+1fCwaSHZ No, we need to keep managers in Beaumont to run that place when you progressive union jerks go on strike again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cvp+1fCwaSHZ

Sounds good! They can have some of our 15000 managers we have at the O&A production site in Beaumont.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dyq+1fCwaSHZ

Post a reply

: