Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Spam of Contol

I’ve never seen an organization with so many people having the titles President, CEO, CFO, SVP, VP, AVP and Chief of Staff. You could easily cut 75% of those people and direct those salaries to individuals that actually do work and create value!!

by
| 1610 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1fJORWVF

13 replies (most recent on top)

Too many managers with fake titles (Vice President, President, Chief... lol) being paid way too much to make PowerPoints and talk about their vision of the future with another "presentation of the month". Meanwhile, the rest of us are trying desperately to hold the company together, despite the C-Suite and Bobbsey Twin whales costing us billions in revenue hand over fist with failed mergers and aquisitions, none of which were the fault of loyal employees who now see their benefits reduced and careers threatened with endless layoffs because of poor management.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6jlc+1fJORWVF

This post is a result of what happens when many of the employees, especially ‘craft’, ‘bargained for’ lack basic knowledge about organizational structures.
BTW, an EVP is higher than SVP and generally reports to the President….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vqr+1fJORWVF

Wow, you folks have a "short" or "selective" memory. Just a few sweet years ago Elliott Management bought enough shares to place Bill Marrow in as a consultant. I saw Bill in a webcast with some of our "leaders" and he stated unequivocally that AT&T was top heavy. 9 levels. Mc Elfresh, in a webcast showed some ba--s to John and stated "We cannot cost cut our way to success". Anyways, Elliott Management decided to cut their losses with AT&T as the management culture was too entrenched.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lrk+1fJORWVF

What is the difference between Executive VP and Sr. VP?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ekh+1fJORWVF

Curious what’s your title? That might explain this post.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bwq+1fJORWVF

Jealous much?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1udz+1fJORWVF

This post only makes sense if you’re a high schooler complaining because you’ve no clue about how businesses operate. LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nvi+1fJORWVF

AT&T is too top heavy at the AVP level and above.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oec+1fJORWVF

name another fortune 11+ company with 200k+ emp that doesn't have as much level 5+

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dgg+1fJORWVF

Hmmm. There are thousands of Mom and Pop shops where you can try to find work where the owner runs the shop, handles customer complaints, writes the checks, places ads for workers, etc. But a corporation with over 200k global employees has many positions doing many different functions, and the skills are not simply and easily transferable. For obvious reasons an AVP in sales is not going to be the person responsible for the financials for the company ie, CFO. Maybe a privately owned company with fewer employees would better suit you….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cwp+1fJORWVF

This post is brought to you by Seagram's 7 and Coca Cola companies. It is still true though. :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @irl+1fJORWVF

Lower hourly pay and worse benefits than top craft, but they have a TITLE!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dkf+1fJORWVF

truth if you did that bmw would lose a lot of business.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @izi+1fJORWVF

Post a reply

: