Thread regarding Fiserv Inc. layoffs

44,000 employees? No way.

Fiserv is still using the old number of 44,000 employees in their press releases and job postings. This was the figure before the mass exodus started. Workday actually shows a headcount of 37K. Embarrasing.

by
| 2238 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1fW4YRnh

12 replies (most recent on top)

Workday doesn't show you the totals for international so that is just US

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @amtd+1fW4YRnh

To last post get real, companies public post say 44,000, but you know best, I don’t think so, you are the dodo.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vto+1fW4YRnh

Hey dodo @2qyb+1fW4YRnh the number matters on a layoff site the fact that Fiserv will not publish a current number. Again we know its 8-10k less than reported.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gxo+1fW4YRnh

Hilarious a debate about 44,000 on this site…next there will be a debate on the cost of the cafeteria…who cares

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qyb+1fW4YRnh

F*ank is an expert scammer and continues to sell lies to all the shareholders. It'd be a shame if the full org chart happened to leak out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2swn+1fW4YRnh

Yes correct Spock, new employees are hired every week and employees leave as well, so no need to doubt anything about 44,000.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hpn+1fW4YRnh

Get your facts straight. 44,000 were employed but in December, 2019. That is a simple Google search so way bogus post. Now many are gone so the current number should be lower. By how much I cannot say.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tfx+1fW4YRnh

Apparently an equal number have been fired or left, and hired or acquired.

Maybe we need to lay off a bunch of people to make room before we make an acquisition?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jju+1fW4YRnh

So it was 44,000 when I left in 2019 and nobody else has been fired or left since. Not Logical said Spock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mbj+1fW4YRnh

Every week a report is published and it shows 44,000 plus or mins 20-300, sorry your misinformation had to be called out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @waw+1fW4YRnh

I would think shareholders would need to be appraised of this information.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @psn+1fW4YRnh

You’d think was material information and could result in a lawsuit

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xsd+1fW4YRnh

Post a reply

: