Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Exclusive-Brazil has oil. Exxon can't seem to find it

HOUSTON (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp has bet billions of dollars on offshore drilling in Brazil, an area it once abandoned and now sees as key to its future.
But five years into its comeback, the U.S. oil giant has yet to make a major oil discovery as an operator in Brazil’s waters and has let opportunities to buy into developments that are now gushing oil slip through its fingers, Reuters has learned.

But the company’s Brazil strategy so far has underwhelmed despite Exxon spending $4 billion with partners on drilling rights there over the past five years. During that time, Exxon has gone from a bit player to participating in 28 offshore leasing blocks - 17 as lead operator - covering 2.5 million net acres. That’s second only to the offshore territory controlled by Petrobras.
Meanwhile, Exxon has spurned deals in other offshore zones in Brazil that are producing like gangbusters.

https://apple.news/AtuKW87IaQYubmYTsOZgW0g

by
| 2593 views | | 20 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1fijLsVk

20 replies (most recent on top)

Maybe we can get back into Ghana a second time? Follow that strategy of bidding on ram pasture 10+ years after another operator makes a discovery because We Are Smarter?

The Liza thing as others have stated was a near miss….if we had drilled that dry ho-e first we would have walked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2daf+1fijLsVk

“Cheapest dry ho!e”
True story, @1ibd+1fijLsVk, I was there!
Mgmt even laughed at Hess for carrying us. They didn’t know they were giving away the most equity ever.

Contrast that to the most expensive well after Julia. Going through the pre-salt took forever and it costed a ton. All for nothing.

That’s the world class exploration leadership we had. No wonder those STCs, chiefs, and now eVPs are quietly retiring.

The only leftover waste of space and talent is now a VP in low carbs, selling fantasies. EO keeps failing upwards. Meanwhile Americas Exploration is done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yyt+1fijLsVk

No way we drill Liza without the commitment well. Total luck. Also despite what exploration managers say, there is no skill involved with the follow on wells - once you have calibrated AVO, it’s like shooting fish in a barrel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wik+1fijLsVk

Bwahaha Bwahaha Exxon can't find no oil. That's hilarious. Keep pumping what you got and we'll start rotating out into better prospects.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ypj+1fijLsVk

“Resting on laurels of Guyana”

There are no laurels for the find in Guyana. That find was an accident.

Exploration was initially sent to Guyana with instructions to “drill the cheapest dry ho-e ever”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ibd+1fijLsVk

@1fzy+1fijLsVk

Not to mention that even for the Stabroek block, at this point about 2/3 of the people on the technical team that made the original discoveries there have either retired (several basically forced), quit, or been laid off. Seems like that should say something about the state of our exploration in and of itself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gex+1fijLsVk

@1fzy+1fijLsVk To be fair, Ardill has been equally unsuccessful in acquisitions and divestments; so the future of geoscience is grim.
MGC has been awful, but as we’ve learned with this company: it can always get worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tmn+1fijLsVk

To be fair, we're not alone - industry as a whole has struck out finding commercial quantities of hydrocarbons in pre-salt Brazil over the past couple years. What annoys me is how we missed out on the conjugate margin in SW Africa, where inferior explorers like RDS & QP likely made a commercial frontier discovery in DW Namibia. Exploration loves to rest their laurels on Guyana but the truth is that we've had a god-awful record outside of Stabroek

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fzy+1fijLsVk

HOUSTON, Feb 14 (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N) has bet billions of dollars on offshore drilling in Brazil, an area it once abandoned and now sees as key to its future.

But five years into its comeback, the U.S. oil giant has yet to make a major oil discovery as an operator in Brazil's waters and has let opportunities to buy into developments that are now gushing oil slip through its fingers, Reuters has learned.

Exxon last year drilled two exploratory wells in an area located 120 miles off Brazil’s southeast coast, the company has acknowledged. But wells in those blocks - dubbed Opal and Tita - didn't show enough potential to justify installing a platform, according to two people familiar with the results. The drilling license fee for the Tita block alone cost the company about a half-billion dollars, Brazilian government records show.

Exxon hasn't moved ahead with so-called appraisal wells in those areas, additional drilling that's a prerequisite for understanding the extent and size of any oil accumulation in preparation for production, the people said.

The company declined to comment on its prospects at Opal and Tita.

There's been more bad news from another block - Uirapuru - in which Exxon holds a minority stake. Brazil's state-controlled oil firm Petrobras, the lead operator, notified Brazil's oil regulator ANP on March 31, 2020 that the petroleum findings were also insufficient to justify further investments.

Exxon told Reuters that hydrocarbons were found at another block it's exploring in a 50-50 partnership with Petrobras as lead operator about 120 miles off Rio de Janeiro. Exxon said drilling at a well dubbed Mairare was completed in August and data was still being analyzed to determine how to proceed.

Such struggles are common in the oil business where developing big discoveries can take years. But there is pressure for Exxon to succeed in Brazil, one of three geographic areas the company is counting on for most of its future production. The other two - Guyana and U.S. shale country - are performing well and ramping up quickly. read more

But the company's Brazil strategy so far has underwhelmed despite Exxon spending $4 billion with partners on drilling rights there over the past five years. During that time, Exxon has gone from a bit player to participating in 28 offshore leasing blocks - 17 as lead operator - covering 2.5 million net acres. That's second only to the offshore territory controlled by Petrobras.

Meanwhile, Exxon has spurned deals in other offshore zones in Brazil that are producing like gangbusters.

The company twice prepared final contracts to bid on discovered reserves put out for public auction by Brazilian authorities, but passed at the last minute, according to four people familiar with the situation. The first pullback occurred in 2019 in a field called Buzios, and most recently in December in another called Sepia, the people said. Petrobras was already producing in both fields, and would have remained as lead operator, with Exxon taking a 45% stake in a bigger reservoir, the people said.

But Exxon balked for fear of overspending on assets in which Petrobras would control the size and pace of development, the people said. Combined the two projects would have required more than $40 billion to develop, the people said.

That's a pile of cash. Still, those two blocks already are producing almost 1 million barrels per day of oil and gas. In December, Buzios alone was producing 739,000 bpd, according to ANP. That's more than the entire country of Venezuela averaged last year. Petrobras plans to ramp up Buzios production to nearly 2 million bpd this decade.

"After carefully reviewing the opportunity, we decided not to participate" in the Buzios and Sepia auctions, spokesperson Meghan Macdonald said without elaborating.

Publicly, Exxon has been nothing but bullish on Brazil. In its most recent earnings report, it characterized Brazil as one of its "highest-quality growth projects".

Last year it committed to investing 40% of the $8 billion needed to develop the Bacalhau offshore field, a project led by Norwegian oil firm Equinor ASA. That field is set to deliver Exxon's first oil from Brazil in 2024.

Exxon has also registered with ANP for another drilling lease auction scheduled for April. "We are excited about the future in Brazil," Exxon Brazil chief Juan Lessmann said at an offshore conference last August in Houston.

Some analysts aren't persuaded.

"What is next for Exxon in Brazil is a big question mark, but with a negative trend so far" said Marcelo Assis, head of Latin America Upstream for energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie. "If Exxon had made a relevant discovery (in its Opal and Tita drilling) they would have disclosed it by now."

RARE EXPLORATION FLOP

Exxon's first big foray into Brazil's offshore fields ended last decade with failure in one of the world's largest oil discoveries this millennium.

In 2005, it was the only international oil major that held licenses in the so-called pre-salt, a vast petroleum formation under a thick layer of salt in the Atlantic seabed. The oil-rich region twice the size of Manhattan would vault Brazil among the world's Top 10 oil producers and reap riches not only for home-grown Petrobras, but foreign companies including Europe's Equinor and Shell PLC.

Exxon, meanwhile, studied seismic images for a couple of years, selected promising spots and spent more than $300 million on complex, time-consuming drilling. The result was three dry holes, the first in 2009, followed by two more in 2011.

In 2012, Exxon returned its block to the Brazil government and tried a different strategy. It became a minority partner in a group of blocks operated by OGX, an oil company founded by Brazilian commodities mogul Eike Batista, who promised to turn it into a "private Petrobras." Within a year, OGX was in bankruptcy and it ultimately halted operations. Batista would later be convicted in Brazil for market manipulation for dumping OGX shares before the company collapsed.

Batista couldn't be reached for comment.

Exxon moved to the sidelines following that episode as well as a change in rules by the leftist Workers' Party that gave Petrobras first dibs on pre-salt discoveries.

EXXON RETURNS By 2017, however, Exxon was back and on a buying spree, snapping up blocks after a new government made Brazil's oil sector more attractive to foreign investors.

Pre-salt fields currently account for 70% of Brazil's total production of 3.7 million barrels per day of oil and gas - the same as Exxon's global output. Some 5.5 million bpd of oil and gas are expected by 2025, according to ANP.

But nothing is guaranteed in these tricky formations. The year before Exxon started drilling again, signs of trouble had emerged in a neighboring offshore field.

There Shell and its partner Chevron Corp came up empty after spending some $800 million on licenses and drilling. Shell said it found little more than water, according to a June 2020 filing with the ANP seen by Reuters.

The consortium is analyzing the results of the 2020 exploratory well and has yet to define the next steps for the project, Shell told Reuters.

It was much the same with Exxon's Opal and Tita wells. In a Nov. 4 filing with the ANP, the company said it found hydrocarbons, but they were insufficient to justify a drilling platform, according to a person familiar with those results.

Exxon is now awaiting an environmental permit to drill in another frontier area hundreds of miles north of the first two wells and away from the pre-salt, according to the ANP.

"The era of big discoveries in the pre-salt is behind us," ANP head Rodolfo Saboia told Reuters in December.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hxt+1fijLsVk

Exploration dept is a fricking joke. They don’t understand the sub salt. They overpaid big time for those dry ho-e leases. Look at what the second place bids were compared to what we paid to win. So much winning. Some people need to be fired.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1haz+1fijLsVk

LMAO. #ExploreroftheYear
The same incompetents who pushed to overpay BILLIONS in Brazil, they can’t stop bragging of discovering oil by accident in Guyana.

But now we have to believe the same people will do just fine doing subsurface work for carbon sequestration. The only transferable skill is to make stuff up and brag about it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fvf+1fijLsVk

That is one final nail in the coffin for Exploration @ EM. Why would the rest of Upstream trust the Geoscience LT given how the Brazil program was executed. Everyone crows on Guyana success…that success/luck was not achieved thru trickery or arrogant exuberance. Those so called leaders that pushed Brazil exploration at the expense of other opportunities (including DU) need to resign or retire in shame.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fyy+1fijLsVk

Does that mean the “collaborative” is over? 😂🤣
Asking for a friend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @upa+1fijLsVk

MGC is retiring to spend more time yelling at kids to get off his lawn (backyard) in The Woodlands.

He’s appeared already several times to “Karen” at the Township meeting during public comment.

It’s going to hit him hard when nobody pretends to care about him or what he has to say. So long, loser.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jaf+1fijLsVk

Interesting that a Senior Executive Vice President with 38 years of experience in various ExxonMobil Development Company assignments is writing his name in the Post ID section.

I wonder if our Public and Government Affairs Office approved the posting of the Reuters article to The Layoff.com by a SVP or the SVP is looking to be NSI'd for violating P&GA policy.

Or someone else used the SVP's name to assign blame instead of using "Anonymous"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvo+1fijLsVk

How many ppl got promotions for this adventure? I remember the arrogance on the EM…and the celebrations after each overpriced bid. In the real world most of those brilliant minds should give back their salaries from 2016-2021.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @osq+1fijLsVk

Congrats, MGC and co.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vxq+1fijLsVk

The lapel flag pin has spoken.
And I’m amazed they didn’t report on the shande of overruling the technical recommendation of Geology with whatever chance of success and value the eVP wanted. STPs and chiefs just rammed what they were told (and wanted) back down to the teams.

And now it looks as if Exploration can’t find their heads out of their as$es - I mean, assesment. 😂

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iom+1fijLsVk

LOL. Made my day. Having lived this first hand nice to see it is also obvious to those outside the company….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @neo+1fijLsVk

At first I thought this was a spoof article….Yikes, it isn’t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gtl+1fijLsVk

Post a reply

: