Thread regarding Ford layoffs

AICP, EBIT, Free Cash Flow, and the GSR

Full Year 2021 Adjusted EBIT by area
North America...$ 7,377
South America...$ (121)
Europe..........$ (154)
China...........$ (327)
International Markets Group $ 622
Automotive Total..........$ 7,397
Mobility........$(1,030)
Ford Credit.....$ 4,717
Corporate Other..$ (1,084)
Adjusted EBIT...$ 10,000

It looks like NA automotive did quite well, and global performed as usual. Looking at this, it isn't apparent to me how our LL5+ are claiming a 135% globally a job well done while saying that the NA GSRs/LL6s didn't contribute enough.

Oh, that's right it is a Cash Flow problem. That is the metric that was used for 50% of the GSR/LL6 bonus calculation.
I see a (1.8b) hit to FCF on inventory. Would our executive team care to explain why we are carrying almost 2b in inventory?
There was (2.3b) on interest. We owe money. Interest is due.
(3.1b) on All Other and timing differences. That's a lot of "other" money, but 2021 was a difficult year and I will assume this money went to that.
(1.9b) on global redesign. Very nice, NA salary staff's bonus metric was penalized because you fired our co-workers. High class sportsmanship there.
(3.7b) Changes in debt. Paid off some high interest debt. Makes sense.
(0.4b) Shareholder distributions. Must pay those that contribute the most.

Whose bright idea was to base the NA GSR bonus metrics off of FCF? What control does a GSR/LL6s have over those FCF factors identified above? And why does it seem that our LL5+ were not graded on the same dismal cash flow metric?

How it appears to me if I am reading the earning slides correctly, NA auto contributed to 73% of our earnings. Ford Credit contributed 47%. Combined, those two groups contributed 12b of your 10b EBIT, or roughly 121%. Basically, you have really angered the group that designs, develops, industrializes, sells, and finances your most profitable products. And you rewarded yourself while doing so. This is not great leadership.

by
| 2009 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1fjh5xru

10 replies (most recent on top)

@1ief+1fjh5xru

Can you identify where you found all of the actual numerical targets (not the weighting percentages) when they were posted for the 2021 AICP last year? One of the main issues is the lack of transparency regarding those numbers. If the $9B FCF target for NA had been 'given out', I think we (and Wall Street) would have definitely noticed and challenged it at the time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bze+1fjh5xru

As far as the metrics someone asked about, they give the metrics when they announce the AICP targets, along with the percentage and goals. So really that shouldn't be as confusing to people. The numbers guy explained it even

The problem to me is how are the targets set to be fair but maybe stretch. People have to have some sense of how to impact things

It would be better to offer less as 100% bonus and give most of it, rather than set higher goal and have metrics chop that in half when people don't understand much of it clearly

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ief+1fjh5xru

Are you saying Ford has too many or not enough women and people of color in management? Would expect Ford is as good or better than GM.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cuh+1fjh5xru

When I heard the Kumar townhall last week trying to explain the rationale for LL5+ getting nearly 3x more than the GSRs it made me sick!!!
Global was one of the reasons. That was like the PR guy for Saddam Hussien (2003) who said American troops will never enter Bagdad, then right behind him on TV You see a M1A1 Abrams rolling past in the background. "COME ON MAN". NA was the only region to make money. Not Europe, Not China sure the he-l not SA.
You don't need to insult us anyone who can read can see those numbers. They are public knowledge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @icz+1fjh5xru
  1. Pump up company as most trusted
  2. Send messages all year about being family, One Ford, our truths, DEI
  3. Bank on A and B by screwing employees on bonus and merit
  4. PROFIT!

That's the Ford+ plan! Sorry Jim, you got caught!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fup+1fjh5xru

I’d like to see the actual calculation on how the 54% was determined. They say we are above or below target, but what are the actual numbers? Inputs and formula. I no longer trust our senior mgt. Transparency = Trust. We have none of that at Ford.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @thu+1fjh5xru

By time the bozos in charge set up the AICP metrics, they already have a good idea what the performance of the metrics will be. The AICP for GSR/LL6 is set up to give us the minimum. That’s why it was changed from the original plan years ago. The less the give GSR/LL6, the more for them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @phl+1fjh5xru

FCF was put in as a way to manipulate what GSR and LL6's get. We are the ones doing the work. I have seen VP's get $1M in bonus on top of stock options. It is disgusting. I am leaving and I am sure a few others are too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cck+1fjh5xru

Based on these numbers, Mobility gets zero bonus, right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @czf+1fjh5xru

Ford is a family run business so like a political party in a third world country. Talent is not a top priority. GM is talent based company. How many women do you see as Supervisors & Managers at Ford? How many people of color? It all starts at the top. Ford family probably forced them to start dividends. GM still has no plans to start dividends.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qsg+1fjh5xru

Post a reply

: