Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

ExxonMobil sues Santa Barbara County over oil transportation denial

By KAREN VELIE

ExxonMobil is suing the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors after it denied a request to restart offshore oil wells shut down in 2015 following an oil pipeline spill.

Specifically, ExxonMobil asked the county board to approve interim trucking routes for the transportation of oil from its offshore drilling platforms. The plan was for up to 24,820 tanker trucks a year to transport the oil on Highway 101 and State Route 166 for up to seven years or until the damaged pipeline is replaced or repaired.

On May 19, 2015, a pipe belonging to Plains All American ruptured near Goleta, causing approxamtly 140,000 gallons of crude oil to spill. Much of the oil flowed into a culvert and then into a ditch that drains into the ocean.

In a 3-2 vote in March, the board denied ExxonMobil’s request.

ExxonMobil contends the denial was an unlawful abuse of discretion.

“Rather than focus on the merits of the project…the board improperly treated the consideration of the project as a referendum on offshore production as well as the transportation and use of crude oil in the County of Santa Barbara,” according to the lawsuit. “But that was not the issue before it. The only question before the board was whether the project complies with federal, state, and local law. It does.”

https://calcoastnews.com/2022/05/exxonmobil-sues-santa-barbara-county-over-oil-transportation-denial/

by
| 1032 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1gNBGCja

8 replies (most recent on top)

A State that uses oil should not crusade to end the use of oil.

It’s like a Carnivore campaigning for people to adopt veganism.

Only people, organizations, and states that currently rely on ZERO hydrocarbons should be allowed to promote a zero hydrocarbon transition.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nao+1gNBGCja

@1ceg States regulate and control a lot of things, from education, to policing, to health policy. You’re probably not whining when reactionary legislators in red states pass laws to criminalize trans kids or to put Mickey Mouse in jail (yes, really, Florida), so what’s your issue with this?

Shocker: some people actually like to have clean air and drinking water. Do the O&G stuff in one of your red states please, thanks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ewy+1gNBGCja

If Santa Barbara county refuses EM to truck crude, then all truck shipments of fuel should be cancelled to that county.

Just fairness.

Restart trucking fuel when the county issues permit for trucking crude.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1teh+1gNBGCja

Why the F does EM need permission from a state government to truck anything?

I get stuff trucked every week and unless it is wide load, no permission required.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ceg+1gNBGCja

There's a pretty slick trick - used by EM among others - to get all these type cases to Eastern Texas district (I think). Easy-going folk there.

While on that topic:
EM pays lawyers daily more than every employee in Baytown for a month.
External lawyers, mind you.
It's deductible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ocq+1gNBGCja

“ExxonMobil sues Santa Barbara County over oil transportation denial”

If it goes to a California state court, EM doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in he-l at winning.

If it goes to a federal trial judge, EM might get lucky and end up with a Trump appointee presiding. Even if they won there, it’ll probably be appealed and reversed by the 9th Circuit. It won’t go to SCOTUS.

So, waste of time and money. Yee-Haww.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dlt+1gNBGCja

Keeping them lawers busy.
That's a sign.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ftq+1gNBGCja

Good luck with that!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tol+1gNBGCja

Post a reply

: