Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Name Change

AT&T needs to change its name to reflect a vision of the 21st century. It’s not a phone company, it is a communications/data company. It also needs a leadership that has a world vision and overwhelming technical skills!!

by
| 981 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1gejIMwe

11 replies (most recent on top)

No to moving forward. Gonna keep looking back and complain about it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ehj+1gejIMwe

I would agree with the idea of a name
change. Our name is not synonymous with technology. The younger generations see it asan antique. I would say most people do not associate Verizon with Bell Atlantic. But Verizon is a well known, updated name that people associate with wireless service. Change the name and move forward, not backwards.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xbn+1gejIMwe

How about T - Bagged.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1eti+1gejIMwe

How about CLUSTER FLUKE

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pmo+1gejIMwe

How about "Stankrizon?"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sdn+1gejIMwe

Maybe we can just change it back to lowercase, since we're no longer a Fortune 10?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lzy+1gejIMwe

Should CVS change their name because they’re more known for pharmacy now instead of “consumer value store”

What about Geico because they’re no longer just the government employee insurance co.?

It’s “better” for a brand to be known and hated by some than completely unknown. The name will probably live in longer than all of us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fmj+1gejIMwe

Just look at Comcast, just because they changed to Xfinity, still is one of the most hated companies in the country. What is in a name?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oba+1gejIMwe

Stupid idea

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tgx+1gejIMwe

SWBT paid an arm and a leg for the at&t name, when they bought the company to keep them out of bankruptcy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kus+1gejIMwe

No way. If you are unhappy with the company name of at&t, go start your own company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jpv+1gejIMwe

Post a reply

: