One of these days, EM Execs will realize that the entire BTC employee pool could have been a service hired through a contracting agency/engineering firm.
Voila, all of BTC will be transitioned to contract staff.
One of these days, EM Execs will realize that the entire BTC employee pool could have been a service hired through a contracting agency/engineering firm.
Voila, all of BTC will be transitioned to contract staff.
This is an advice for all contractors, if you think that you are going to be hire, share some knowledge after you have been contracted, not before. If you are just working as a contractor do your job, but no share knowledge, because at the the end you are going to be fire, but your knowledge will stay with them.
This is the third time that someone has taken a comment that I made to a thread, and made a new thread with it. Seems odd to read my statements in different places.
Our contractors in our section are essentially treated exactly the same as EM employees, so you're correct, I don't see the benefit of employed status here. No training and ranking kicking excluded obviously...
Yes, btc was transition step (which started over a decade ago) towards shifting workers to low cost locations.
Current thinking is to shift btc to service providers for even greater flexibility/low cost (although debatable given current hcl performance in India).
It’s almost like em is using a page out of Netflix “test and learn” - except for em, we are a decade behind the curve and not learning fast.
With the current US ranking system we’re essentially contractors ourselves with renewed contracts annually
We're mostly contractors in Europe already it appears. And I believe there's a lot of annuitants in the US?
Investing in people...
Yes, as a share holder, I believe you are correct in your thinking