Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Did age become a liability at Chevron?

It seems that people over a certain age are being pushed out, one way or another.

by
| 2890 views | | 20 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1gmx1Crf

20 replies (most recent on top)

Yes, at least on successful age discrimination suit from circa 2016, class action no doubt to follow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pqaa+1gmx1Crf

This is not about being white or non-white, male or female -- Chevron is specifically downgrading PSGs and eliminating experienced workers. The company much prefers the "new model" to the "old model". You may think this is not your issue now if you're <40.
Curious how the ageism lawsuits post-Transformation are going.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dptg+1gmx1Crf

@2lip, you're obviously too young to have been 'discreetly' approached 3 times 2015-2020 and be 'encouraged' to consider retirement. By 2020 it was just, 'if you don't retire, you'll probably be laid off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4tih+1gmx1Crf

Of course those who are older are likely more financially secure and could retire, thus higher percentage of EOI. DUH….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lip+1gmx1Crf

I took the EOI package in an earlier re-org. CVX H.R. provided the EOI applicants with the age demographics of the EOI pool. If I recall correctly about 85% of the EOI applicants were 50+ year old.
The next phase of the re-org was the "involuntary" layoffs. I heard from credible sources that >70% of this group was also the 50+ population.
Draw your own conclusions, but to me it is obvious that ageism is alive and well, not only in CVX, but in the wider corporate world.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2igc+1gmx1Crf

True that. As long as you aren't any kind of minority, you'd do great

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2krs+1gmx1Crf

Yep. It's like being back in the 1950s.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gix+1gmx1Crf

So the Shipping BU values people who work hard for their salary and realize that everything is not free for me, plenty of bennies for me that others have to pay for cuz I be special? Wow. Imagine that!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pol+1gmx1Crf

Not all BUs are like that. The Shipping BU values white males.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gne+1gmx1Crf

The current retiree medical benefit only offered if you make it to 50 years old and with minimum 10 years of service. Benefit is not guaranteed, days so right on cover page of benefit plan document.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1osj+1gmx1Crf

@wxu, similar experience. My last five years before the glorious 2020 severance were marked with 0% raises (“but look at your bonus!”), being told there was no way I was getting promoted, being ignored when opinions were sought, and being passed over so inexperienced high pots could get management positions. Not to worry, that severance package was wonderful, the remaining staff can only dream of making it to around 60 and being paid to retire early. Never mind the organizational turmoil and lack of long term vision facing Chevron now!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kyk+1gmx1Crf

Unless you’re a VP or on the board...you can be as old and as white as you want!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1htt+1gmx1Crf

Being white and 50 or older at CVX is essentially a death sentence when layoffs come along.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fsa+1gmx1Crf

: @zmg you are part of the problem you criticize. What were you doing at his retirement party if you despise him so much?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @buz+1gmx1Crf

They said I can stay till I pass!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ezo+1gmx1Crf

This is not new or unique to CVX

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iaq+1gmx1Crf

I was asked by two managers why didn't I just take the EOI? I was then told by my direct supervisor that he had convinced one job owner not to select me because of my age.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @epw+1gmx1Crf

It’s a double edge sword being over a certain age. On the plus side, age usually goes hand-in-hand with experience, which is a valuable asset to keep. On the other hand, the older an employee is, the higher cost burden he/she becomes (higher pay, higher cost of insurance, higher pension accrual). Which way to go in a decision of who stays and who goes is up to a few people in the company. It’s the deciders that matter how their decisions will affect the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sxw+1gmx1Crf

I "retired" during the last wave of reorganization and severance packages. I can't speak for all "older" employees or former older employees but will share my personal experience. During my last year and half of employment I was interested in changing positions and when I spoke to my PDR he told me that he looked at my information and based on my age (similar to his) wasn't I ready to retire--why did I want another position. I also spoke to a job owner and she flat out told me that she was looking for a younger person for her position.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wxu+1gmx1Crf

Absolutely all males especially white males are being pushed out of the door....someday the company and its shareholders will regret the discrimination they have allowed MW and his Woke queen to implement in the name of inclusion

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pci+1gmx1Crf

Post a reply

: