Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

64% Of workers…

64% of workers would consider quitting if asked to return to the office full-time

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/28/64percent-of-workers-would-consider-quitting-if-asked-to-return-to-office-full-time.html

by
| 1205 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1guHoQVn

9 replies (most recent on top)

There's no way only 64% would consider it. Unless that doesn't count the other 30% who would absolutely quit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vao+1guHoQVn

Hi team, this is Charlie. You will leave when I lay you off and not a minute sooner.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1avj+1guHoQVn

Seems low. I would have thought closer to 90%. Almost everyone I know at WF is looking to leave. Only exception are the lifers that have been there 20+ years who are just waiting for a package and/or retirement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tbo+1guHoQVn

Save us all, please quit now
You know, since there are so many WFH jobs out there why are many complaining people still here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @flg+1guHoQVn

Glad there are so many wealthy folks out there. Unfortunately, I need my paycheck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ckk+1guHoQVn

D-mb. Why would you consider quitting a job because you're asked to come in to the office? Really? I can think of things far worst to consider quitting a job over.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gqe+1guHoQVn

I spent over 10 years at WellsFargo and considered quitting after my first three days. I continued to consider quitting every year for over 10 years.

My point is / “considering quitting” is absolutely meaningless.

It’s a clickbait story.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ura+1guHoQVn

Would like office away from home, but don't want commute or open floor plan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lsc+1guHoQVn

I have an extremely hard time understanding how these surveys work, and what question people think they are answering. The headline number here doesn't seem unreasonable at first glance, but what does it actually mean?
From the article: "About 71% of 18-to 24-year-olds said that they would consider looking for another job if their company insisted on them returning to the office full-time, compared to 61% of 35- to 44-year-olds and 56% of 45- to 54-year-olds, the report found."
What was the actual question asked, though? Was it "Would you consider looking for another job if your company insisted on you returning to the office full-time?", word for word?
How can any reasonable person answer "no" to a question in the form "Would you consider looking for another job if ?" Given that so many people look for other jobs in any given period (say a decade), one has to assume that even more people (nearly all?) consider looking for another job in the same period. So without period restrictions in the question, why does matter to the answerer's answer? "Would you consider looking for another job? Yes, just like I would consider staying, consider what I'm having for dinner, etc."
I know this seems nitpicky, especially in the context of a survey that doesn't /seem/ to say anything surprising, but I really don't understand if I'm just overthinking things, if the questions that are being asked in these surveys but not disclosed are actually much better phrased than it appears, or if people are often answering a very different question than what the survey thinks it's asking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ywi+1guHoQVn

Post a reply

: