Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

I don't get the logic behind it

As far as I know, the process of hiring new employees who need a lot of training costs the company MUCH MORE than motivating the existing employees to stay here. Isn't that right? EM obviously has different reasoning for their decisions.

by
| 1723 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1h0TW0DQ

8 replies (most recent on top)

Newbies believe lies more easily

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lxp+1h0TW0DQ

Headcount is too high due to overhiring and empire building when times were fat d-mb and happy under Rex. While imperfect short term we'll get the numbers down then optimize roles. EM also ranks people on their behavior in and out of work. They like a nice clean work force. Anyone causing trouble or giving bad impressions is out

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gbp+1h0TW0DQ

Training. You spend what you like on that. You can throttle that down easy.
Pensions and other 'commitments' are a different matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uzc+1h0TW0DQ

@1zoc+1h0TW0DQ

"Less quality ... Less cost." Also known as cutting corners. But hey, it's not like I can remember a time cutting corners had any severe negative consequences in the oil industry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jxa+1h0TW0DQ

New hires are cheaper and this process gives the ability to outsource at a greater pace.. Management is comfortable with less quality, more quantity at less cost….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zoc+1h0TW0DQ

Management is just plain stupid some of the time. Well, maybe most of the time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @spv+1h0TW0DQ

The strategy is Work force refresh … new, younger, cheaper , less baggage

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wey+1h0TW0DQ

Not if you don’t hire replacements.

taps temple

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @evi+1h0TW0DQ

Post a reply

: