Thread regarding IBM layoffs

How IBM Could Become A Digital Winner

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2022/07/25/how-ibm-could-become-a-digital-winner/

by
| 1718 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1hUpAxmf

13 replies (most recent on top)

@4pbq+1hUpAxm:

As a matter of fact, YOU are wrong. The original poster (@1wym+1hUpAxmf) was correct and his post does not need fixing. The poster mentioned "NY Post" and "Washington Times". Both of these are real "newspapers". NY Post is a tabloid and Washington Times is a right-wing rag. Hence, neither are worth reading.

The poster could not have intended to mention "NY Times" and "Washington Post" because both are widely read and considered serious newspapers. His/her post would have made no sense if he mentioned them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6bcp+1hUpAxmf

@1wym+1hUpAxmf --

Its [sic] like thinking the New York Post or the
Washington Times are worth reading.

Can't help but notice the obvious mistake with the transposition of words "Times" and "Post", as well as the missing apostrophe, so correcting all these here:

"It's like thinking the New York Times or the Washington Post are worth reading."

There, I fixed it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4pbq+1hUpAxmf

Satya is a PRO, AK is an amateur that has not a chance to become a PRO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fyf+1hUpAxmf

RT is a wiener.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ftm+1hUpAxmf

No wonder Rob Thomas said "to read" to IBMers a couple of weeks ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2oas+1hUpAxmf

If you really read the article, it's nowhere near praising IBM or AK, but praising Satya.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2sgo+1hUpAxmf

More like digital wiener. And that's probably too complimentary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gbk+1hUpAxmf

Same with Barron's. There's some d I c k out there that's always posting references to that rag on this site. Probably a Barron's employee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gtd+1hUpAxmf

Folks, Forbes is a garbage website. It is nothing like the glory days of the magazine. Now it just picks up any cr-p it can publish. Don't waste your time with Forbes. Its like thinking the New York Post or the Washington Times are worth reading.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wym+1hUpAxmf

Forbes is saying nothing that the street has asked from IBM for the last 10 years. Streamline management, dump certain pieces of legacy, and decide what you want to be when you grow up

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eyx+1hUpAxmf

I remember how Forbes praised the WageWorks workplace - right before they shut down their entire San Mateo headquarters and got rid of thousands and thousands of employees (and company is not that big). Any time Forbes consider a firm a "winner" - better watch out. Every company Forbes write about ends up cursed. Yes - they get paid to "praise" the company. We know now for sure IBM is doomed. I hope Forbes will never write about my workplace.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kux+1hUpAxmf

Another "objective" Forbes article, sponsored by IBM.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yzo+1hUpAxmf

Wishful thinking, IMHO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @acf+1hUpAxmf

Post a reply

: