Well - it’s a good idea to try to pinpoint the risks which the C-Suite might not otherwise know about.
However, let’s assign ratings to the risks which are created by the C-Suite
-
Offshoring, which gives third-world countries access to customer’s personal financial information and creates the risk of further reputational damage and more lawsuits.
-
Offshoring, which gives third- world countries access to our systems thus making WFC more vulnerable to being hacked and the risk of further reputational damage and more lawsuits.
-
Overzealous cost-cutting, leaving teams short-handed and forcing managers to make shortcut decisions which leave us vulnerable to very large errors.
-
CEO and BOD who have wasted $20 Billion this year on company stock buybacks rather than investing in the technology, infrastructure and talent necessary to improve all levels of risk.
-
Toxic atmosphere and layoffs, leading to the loss of employees with vast institutional knowledge and the degrading of organizational effectiveness.
-
Toxic atmosphere which could lead to internal intentional damaging events.
-
Smoke and mirrors focus on irrelevant and complex routines which give the illusion of risk controls, when the largest and most dangerous risks are staring everyone in the face. C-Suite is unwilling to address the largest and most hazardous potential risks because either: A. They cost too much money to properly fix and/ or B. They are impossible to fix with the bank’s outdated technology held together with bubble gum and bailing wire.
I could keep going- but I would identify the bank’s largest potential risks as being a self-serving CEO and a sleepy BOD who consistently fail to properly prioritize and effectively execute in a manner with best serves the long-term health of the bank, it’s shareholders, and it’s customers.