Thread regarding IBM layoffs

RA - 9/8/2022

If you are RA today please let us know country, division and age.

by
| 3206 views | | 15 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1iCiLt7p

15 replies (most recent on top)

@5zly+1iCiLt7p

IBM is PIPing not RAing this time around... it is cheaper that way.

I personally got PIPed, and will be leaving IBM with probably nothing.

IBM sucks like someone else said.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7pok+1iCiLt7p

The lack of a public RA seems to imply IBM is having a better than expected 3rd Q. Given all of the “headwinds” announced during the 2nd Q analyst call, and the FCF modification, you certainly would have expected IBM to take some action. Perhaps the legacy bleed is finally slowing down, and the new strategy is getting some traction

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5zly+1iCiLt7p

in IBM speak, PIP="performance improvement plan". In the 1980s, PIP meant "peripheral interface protocol" (CPM 80). I'm so glad to be retired from all the bullship.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5lmw+1iCiLt7p
targeted toward older workers who are expensive.

There is a way to solve that (at least for health care expenses), but the USA won't do it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vah+1iCiLt7p

I was aldo put on a pip. Impossible goals to reach.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2aof+1iCiLt7p

Pips = new RA strategy for IBM. Less litigation exposure. Still BS and targeted toward older workers who are expensive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yyr+1iCiLt7p

Yawn

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mxr+1iCiLt7p

I was put on a pip this week.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kmx+1iCiLt7p

usa, 92, 88

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dcv+1iCiLt7p

usa, 92, 68

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qtu+1iCiLt7p

Bruh there’s no clarity

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gkl+1iCiLt7p

“ Did you hear that the Queen has passed?”

Yeah, IBM is all over it…. It what it has to do with IBM aside the fact Krishna thinks he is Royalty!! Lol! What a mo--n!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cxp+1iCiLt7p

Did you hear that the Queen has passed?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kwq+1iCiLt7p

Reported for Spam

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kld+1iCiLt7p

garhhx

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iwe+1iCiLt7p

Post a reply

: