Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Here Comes the RTO Whip

Commercial Real Estate is already crashing and WF is already suffering because of it.

https://sfstandard.com/business/san-francisco-braces-for-epic-commercial-real-estate-crash/

"A few large buildings, like 550 California St. and 455 Market St, were placed on the market in recent months at deep discounts to what they would have fetched before the pandemic, but were eventually pulled when offers came in that were even lower than those already-discounted prices.

In the case of 550 California St., a downtown office tower owned by Wells Fargo, bids came in at 60% to 70% under what the building would have sold for in 2019, real estate brokers said. "

by
| 2876 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1iDwc3aC

11 replies (most recent on top)

@1wjx+1iDwc3aC

Yeah it'll be "affordable", to people making $250k+/yr. Good think we're looking out for that group. Don't think they'd be able to survive without a government program to keep their housing costs down. 😐

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3cmx+1iDwc3aC

the article making a point about the price being lower today than it would have been if sold pre-covid is a pretty useless observation. The fact is that 550 cal did get sold, so there was someone willing to pay a price that WF was willing to accept.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vva+1iDwc3aC

Housing doesn’t need to be low income, just affordable to those of us who aren’t in the c-suite.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wjx+1iDwc3aC

Turn these useless old inner-city office buildings into low-income housing. These companies keep preaching DE&I to us, let's see them put their money where their mouth is.


You go work at an office adjacent to low income housing. I am not!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lcd+1iDwc3aC

"The people in power in the Big Cities aren't interested in doing anything that would actually reduce the cost of housing..."

Correct. The higher the housing costs the more tax revenue from the property and the income/spending of the residents. Cities are finite in land area and cannot just annex more whenever they want.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wtk+1iDwc3aC

The sold one of the buildings in Minnesota for far less than what it was worth. No one wanted it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zzp+1iDwc3aC

@oyc+1iDwc3aC

"Low income housing" is code for "very expensive housing, with some kick backs/corruption". It's never EVER inexpensive. It's all lies and always has been. The people in power in the Big Cities aren't interested in doing anything that would actually reduce the cost of housing, but they want the PR of trying.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pde+1iDwc3aC

Real estate is collapsing everywhere. Many businesses have learned that they can save money by reducing their office footprint with remote workers.

Banks, obviously, will be harmed by this. It is affecting businesses who lived off office workers. Local governments, particularly urban areas where it is desirable to commute into instead of live there (cities like Baltimore, St. Louis) will see massive hits in tax income.

For environmental and energy concerns, this is actually a positive.

But since this negatively affects local governments and some powerful businesses, they will fight it out of their own interests instead of being forward thinking on how to adapt and chase where consumers shift their spending.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vcp+1iDwc3aC

Burn, Baby, Burn.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xkr+1iDwc3aC

Turn these useless old inner-city office buildings into low-income housing. These companies keep preaching DE&I to us, let's see them put their money where their mouth is.

Time for these big companies to stop "Talking the Talk" and start "Walking the Walk".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oyc+1iDwc3aC

I discovered that many of those WF teams working at 550 California Pre-pandemic were already moved to 420 Montgomery.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dhe+1iDwc3aC

Post a reply

: