Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Do execs read this?

Are there may CL30+ who read this board? What’s your thoughts on the company direction and desire to stop attrition?

by
| 2921 views | | 14 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1iGSxkhv

14 replies (most recent on top)

Chances a CL 30 e eu tive is on here not just a loser? I highly doubt an executive is reading this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3myg+1iGSxkhv

Hello retired CL30+ exec.

Woha!

It is comforting to hear that you confirm what we all suspected.

You know, it is easier to leave a relationship knowing for a fact that the relationship is over than suspecting it.

For those who needed any further confirmation that your days at ExxonMobil are counted, here it is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3zla+1iGSxkhv

@2bcq+1iGSxkhv

Wow.

Thank you for this transparency and courage of conviction moment.

Perhaps, if you were this transparent about your intensions and admit publicly that you fkd up between 2017 and 2021, as opposed to lying to your employees with fake promises of meaningful long term careers and fake performance reviews designed to get rid of people regardless of their performance you would achieve your headcount goals more rapidly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wwp+1iGSxkhv

Every morning in Annandale ,you bet🤡🤡🤡

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mat+1iGSxkhv

@2bcq+1iGSxkhv

Thank you for confirming all of my preconceived ideas of what you guys are like.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ivi+1iGSxkhv

I am a retired CL 30+. Most of us retired executives agree that XOM is still overstaffed and more reductions in headcount are needed. We support cutting bottom 10%. We support asset sales to reduce headcount. We support higher Dividends even if it means fewer employees or moving jobs to low cost countries like India, Argentina and Hungary. I do not understand why headcount increased between 2017 and 2021, that made the reductions painful. If we had steadily reduced headcount from 2017 thru today using PIP, we would not had to have involuntary layoffs in 2020.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bcq+1iGSxkhv

If CL 30 and above are powerless, then who has power?

Power is earned when the people below follow you and give you that power.

So why give your talent or time to a company of so called leaders that lack integrity and compassion when it comes to its people? The lies, the manipulation, the shaming, the backstabbing so someone can become top dog and get that fancier title? It’s not worth it.

Leave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iuq+1iGSxkhv

Twice more please 😁

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bwr+1iGSxkhv

CL30+ scoff at us paeans and our picayune issues. They played the game and got theirs. We are just a bunch of cry babies and sore losers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mfw+1iGSxkhv

If they do, they will dismiss everyone here as angry, depressed, ungrateful, disgruntled, and underrepresenting cultural misfits.

Typical ExxonMobil management characterization of any dissenting voice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dif+1iGSxkhv

CL 30’s are powerless. Even VPs have no authority.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ets+1iGSxkhv

@OP What difference does it make?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zhk+1iGSxkhv

CL30's too busy sucking up to their managers. Gone are the days when a manager (at least some) would take a stand.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yhs+1iGSxkhv

We are busy shifting work to India, and I don’t really see a problem in folks with commodity rated skills leaving. Why would I work to reduce what is saving the company money?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zqx+1iGSxkhv

Post a reply

: