Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

What is the upper cut off point for PIPs?

I’m sure there’s an upper cut-off for PIPs. is it at exec level or above? My sup is acting extremely weird and I have a feeling he is on a PIP but he’s an exec so I’m a not sure.

by
| 2515 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1iMHS6Fq

10 replies (most recent on top)

None of these executives being mentioned got PIP’d. When you’re at that level it’s basically Game of Thrones. When Darren ascended the iron throne the announcements page retirements were the analogous red wedding scene.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xih+1iMHS6Fq

Yes, executives can fall out of grace and be forced to retire, but that has very little in common with a PIP. As mentioned, they don’t simply loose their job, they get to retire - so they are first allowed to become RE. Second, they have a bunch of “awards”, including RSUs, no to mention the supplemental pension that can be way more than a million. These “nice things” are discretionary, so they loose them if they don’t retire when they’re told to, or if they want to retire too early or if they want to work somewhere else after retiring.
A lot of people would be OK to be PIPed if that would come with a million dollars attached.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fhh+1iMHS6Fq

A couple of im_n’exiles posting on this thread who like to believe that all that’s toxic at EM is because older employees are still around. I’m not surprised by how mean and short-sighted these comments are, after all, this is the preferred personality at EM. However, the stupidity is amazing. So, when EM will get rid of all “lifers”, it’s going to be all milk and honey, right? First, the overwhelming majority of “lifers” left at this point are management, so they’re not going anywhere until they get their multi-million retirement packages. Second, by the time EM is done with this forced attrition, your job will have been long moved to Bangalore, OP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dmi+1iMHS6Fq

@1sai+1iMHS6Fq they don’t PIP those types of jobs, just the company initiates early retirement

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1izz+1iMHS6Fq

I have seen Execs “forced” to retire. Usually kept very hush hush.

One VP was commanded to return to Houston in middle of business travel. She received that call while changing planes in Paris. Immediately returned to USA and within minutes of arriving to her Campus office the next morning, was told she was retiring and had to leave Campus immediately.

The retirement announcements for these exits are typically a 1 liner instead of a paragraph about career.

If anyone knows why she was exited in this fashion, please post.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aou+1iMHS6Fq

At a certain level - even as low as 29 - it's simply not 'called' a PiP.
It's more a kissy-faced buh-buh good friend.
And completely different Separation Agreements.
Instead of 3 months for example, it's a month per year of service.
And RSUs out the wah-zooz.

The papers still need to be notarized.
That might be the only similarity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ccx+1iMHS6Fq

Brian Milton was PIPed?!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sai+1iMHS6Fq

High level execs can be told to retire without getting PIP'd. See the abnormally large amount of VPs that retired with the reorganization in April. Or the CCS president that got replaced by the guy from GM. I'm not feeling sorry for them, just pointing out they aren't somehow above being replaced.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rmk+1iMHS6Fq

There is no cutoff, see B.Milton, for example

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tmj+1iMHS6Fq

Yes, executive level manager can get the PIP. Historically, it was used on old timers hanging on with 40+ years and milking the Company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ipc+1iMHS6Fq

Post a reply

: