Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Thought for today (and every day): Fire Charlie

For God’s sake, let’s get rid of him before there’s no bank left to manage.

Our subversive CEO is “slowly boiling the frog”. Charlie is gradually selling off profitable pieces of the bank, downsizing parts of the bank which were profitable before he took over, and appears to be investing little in to the bank’s future. (Technology is backsliding. I don’t see any visionary “competitive advantage” transformations happening.) He is offshoring every job imaginable. (Ask your manager about the e-mails pressuring him/her to specify every possible position to be sent to India.)

There seems to be no movement on his “#1 goal” to get WFC out from under the Federal Asset Cap.

Charlie is slowly destroying our ability to compete amongst the top US financial institutions. He is actively cutting our product mix and damaging our ability to serve our customer’s comprehensive needs. He has created a toxic culture which is is unable to attract and retain the right talent.

One has to ask the question: Was this the plan at the onset??? Dismantle the bank without putting shareholders on high alert? Charlie gets to walk away with his personal retirement fully funded and everyone else is left holding the bag…hmmm.

The only people profiting from these 3 damaging years are Charlie and his executive cronies. Who’s not benefiting? Wells Fargo. Our shareholders. Our employees. Our customers. Our communities. American workers.

Before some else says it, let’s get rid of the entire BOD while we’re on the topic. They are the jokers who picked him and who, not only let him keep the job, but gave him a 20% raise. That is an insult to shareholders’ and regulators’ intelligence. Board members are supposed to be stewards of the public trust.

In conclusion: WFC stock is 7 points LOWER today than when Charlie took leadership of the bank, while the DJIA is 5000 points HIGHER. The dividend is 40% LESS than it was before Charlie slashed it. We are still not out from under the Federal Asset Cap, and there is no ETA in sight. Scandals continue to unfold. The needle is pointing in the wrong direction. What more clarification does anyone need?

by
| 1595 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ifaEGVO

5 replies (most recent on top)

Charlie company is doing well, nothing to see here, just shut up and move on. Unless you get laid off, then quietly move out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3uli+1ifaEGVO

Wells Fargo math:

  • BOD keeps Charlie, who does nothing productive, and pays him $24,500,000 per year in salary.
  • Charlie spends $20,000,000,000 per year attempting to manipulate the stock price higher, and fails.
  • $20,024,500,000 would pay the salary for 200,000 PRODUCTIVE employees at $100,000 per year.
  • BOD wants to keep Charlie and get rid of the employees.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sqv+1ifaEGVO

Selling off WF is what Scharf was hired to do. The BOD hired him to do it. And his mentor, JD, directly benefits. I've been saying this ever since Scharf came on board. WF is circling the drain intentionally.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dtg+1ifaEGVO

Wells Fargo will be the end of Charlie's career as a chief executive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gky+1ifaEGVO

He's been wanting to shrink the bank since he arrived. The brain drain (talent and clients leaving) has done irreparable damage, in my opinion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pyy+1ifaEGVO

Post a reply

: