Hans is a loser, always has been, always will be. It seems that running a company like VZ would require a top notch leader. The reality is that the three major US wireless carriers are lead by losers. Not a single one of them could run a sidewalk lemonade stand. And yet these companies BOD pay them millions, why?
10 replies (most recent on top)
Hans in a multimillionaire.
He won at life.
Not really seeing loser there. Not someone I like based on what Ive seen but then Im postings on a Verizon layoff board so not winning much here.
Who are the best up and comers to the CEO role in the wireless industry that you would support?
Hans is concerned with the WEF and destroying this company and America
The current CEO has no background nor aptitude as to how to handle and deal with the US Consumer where the US Consumer is 67%+ of the US economy. Sweden does not work with the fierce competition nor stock market driven capitalization for successful large mega corporations.
As a successor, to clean after the predecessor, is no new tasking, for any incoming CEO. However, there were other, better, candidates of choice, external vetting needed serious considerations. The "independent" Board of Directors have failed. Where are the voting shareholders?? And, to have promoted, the current CEO, because of an #1 network and now four (4) years, tied for the best network, if not #2, while holding excess capacity.
Part of Hans problem is he's had to clean up the mess left by his predecessor
Go back to sleep Hans!
And you can? Oh wait you said losers, guess you won’t run either a lemonade stand…! No fan of Hans myself, but dayuuuummmm that confidence …
I’m pretty sure the loser is the guy posting the original thread and not the guy catching checks…you could do better? Put your money where your mouth is and stop trolling on this outrageous website.
Agree, where is the loyalty, prudence and efficacy of the VZ Board of Directors??????? Just where?????????? Frankly, my bread, my vested stake, is buttered with Verizon.