Manager showed an excellent review version A to the employee in the review meeting, with the timestamp showing when the employee signed and acknowledged it. Then manager sneakily added a very bad review version B , without letting anyone know, it also had the Timestamp on when this version B was added. Many days and months later, secret version B was discovered. Very creative....
Original poster @1dnb+1jJYv1o0 I hope this is not a common practice here, but everything is possible
Here at BOA, the accepable process is the managers at all levels will never give an exceeds rating to a high performing employee. The goal is to never show that there are employees that are smarter, more qualified and would do a much better job than their manager. The best employees never exceed and the company goes on being managed by mediocre phonies. Promotions to manager roles at all levels continue to use favoritism and cronyism as the accepted criteria.
For some reason, from last speech of CEO, I think CEO possibly suffer from Alzheimer's disease or similar neurological disorder at early stage. Not sure if CEO already started the early treatment or CEO realized it. Let’s wait and see.
If they’re using Workday then the employee has a chance to rebut the posted review after the manager has posted it.
This shlit happens here all the time. We have a bunch of wussy leaders here that are afraid to tell you about a bad review. This company has a bunch of awful managers. I mean they are worthless and are just a bunch of EMPTY SUIT MOTHAFOCKAS!!!! The CEO only cares about going on CNBC and telling his lies with his big azz head about how good shlit is going over here at BAC which stands for BACKWARD AZZ COMPANY!!!