Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel needs a systemic overhaul

If you work here, you know the place is posh. Its great to have a nice workplace but that leads to complacency, laziness, ineptitude, tons of bureaucracy, low morale and poor execution. If you work in the fab, you know how much bs you have to deal with, how short handed it is, how horribly run it is, how chaotic it is, how hard it is to find tools, managers not really listening to techs - you wonder how this place stays running at all! If you work as an engineer, you know the long hours and see the inefficiencies. The whole system is just too bloated and too bureaucratic - getting the simplist things done is hampered needlessly; their network portal is a dumpster fire, so scattered and convoluted it is impossible to find things, contacting HR, submitting a ticket ...the computers are slow and outdated and Outlook wont work half the time. And no one wants to make changes that need to happen cuz everyone is too comfortable and too scared to do anything meaningful - and this is what you get - layoffs due to so many systemic issues and a company that is weakning.

In the world of business, you are swimming with sharks. Intel is a very Woke culture which is great, and has lots of benefits and decent salary but in business, sorry to say, you've got to be tough and hard and vicious at times. Intel has gotten too soft and too bloated and needs a change. Sure, keep the woke culture and the nice amenities but they need to hire a bunch of "starving dogs" who will come in, who really are fearless and take risks reasonably, shake out the beaucracy, make the changes that need to happen and be unapologetic about it. I love me some kindness, wokeness and poshness and goodwill toward mankind (which Intel is starting to brand itself as) but sometimes you just have to be a hard-@ss and a bad-@ss to get sh*t done. That's what Intel needs or Intel is going to weaken.

by
| 2587 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jo4dFYf

12 replies (most recent on top)

OP, Im confused. You said: "So stop with the whole race and identity tangent already. Intel needs a culture of being a bunch of driven badasses instead of just complacent lazyness and bureaucracy" . Isn't the cause of the lack of this culture and the focus on 'race and identity' caused by "wokeness", which you said you wanted to keep and think ti will be a source of Intel returning to better days?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hep+1jo4dFYf

OP, the answer to your question is the comment about Santa Clara campus, that is the root cause and answer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cbn+1jo4dFYf

Geeze! You people are totally missing the point. As the OP I am not saying that people because of their identity race color belief etc is the specific issue its the fact that people off all stripes are just too complacent, lazy, bureaucratic and dont have the drive to make the changes needed to get Intel where it needs.

People want to di-k around on their smartphones all day and do a half a-s job get paid and go home. People dont want to make things efficient they want bureaucratic processes. People are too afraid to speak up and management wont make the changes to make things better.

So stop with the whole race and identity tangent already. Intel needs a culture of being a bunch of driven badasses instead of just complacent lazyness and bureaucracy

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xgb+1jo4dFYf

What minority, have you been to Santa Clara campus, I see mostly non-whites and mainly from a single country, so not sure what the comments about minority is all about.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @upf+1jo4dFYf

@muk did make valid points. Anybody involved in the recent hiring probably saw it. You ranked candidates by merit, then about half the time you threw out any that weren’t the “right type”, and finally selected whoever was left on top. It’s not their fault that they were hired in a biased way, but don’t try to say that we hire the best when the process blatantly and openly discriminates.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @apa+1jo4dFYf

Duh. Why didn’t you interview for CEO position? God’s man is in charge now. Hallelujah.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hpr+1jo4dFYf

This has nothing to do with race, it’s about impenetrable bureaucracy. By the time the entire company is run by bureaucrats, it’s over - the cancer has metastasized.

Who will cut through bureaucracy when the bureaucrats have the power? Google “Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fho+1jo4dFYf

Enlighten me why is work culture root of the issue? While every key leadership position is held by a white person.

Ann, Michelle, Sandra, Dave, Christoph, all of them holding key positions are white. You don’t see their lack of vision is the problem ? They are completely clueless and incompetent to lead, barely have any idea of the real execution issues.

How convenient for you to blame the failures of these incompetent leadership ( mostly white) on a minority group.

Racial intolerance has caused a lot of heart ache throughout history. No need to repeat history. Please be respectful and sensitive to the feelings of minority populations who don’t deserve to be unjustly blamed for mistakes they didn’t commit.

Also work on your logic and reasoning skills , sure you’ll soon understand who lead us downhill

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @atw+1jo4dFYf

Not sure what Intel you work but I haven’t experienced anything like what you are saying. Been there 8 years and still enjoying it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aim+1jo4dFYf

Some will say BK did some courageous acts and got rid of thousands. We haven't even recovered from that. There is plenty of talented and hard working starving dogs. Buzz words like systemic changes are nice to throw around and blame something no one understands.. problem repeatedly is NOT those on the bottom. Its the middle/executive layer that cant get their sh-t together. It is lacking vision and this doesnt fall on ICs. "systemic changes" got us what you call hardass badass and they happily left with $$$. Intel is no where close to the industry "woke" and some of it is marketing that tends to pay off. I suggest not picking a minority and casually blaming them for the mistakes of leadership (mostly white, lets not forget).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ejs+1jo4dFYf

Pat is doing it as expected. Enjoy the ride.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ogk+1jo4dFYf

OP , you said it right, Intel is a very Woke culture which is at the root of the issues we are having. We cannot hire the "right' people for the jobs anymore but rather the "correct" people. Everything action has its reaction and a consequence.

How is the Build Back Better working for you now or don't you see the connection in all that is happening either?

peace.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @muk+1jo4dFYf

Post a reply

: