Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

The earnings call

Wells Fargo’s Q1 2025 earnings call kicked off, and bam—stock dumped to the $50s. Low-key as he-l, nearly two hours (1:47, a record?), but Mike Santomassimo (MS) fielded questions like a champ, and it clawed back, phoenix-style. Charlie Scharf was there, chirping occasionally—some vague bit about “servicing customers”—but why’s he so quiet? Thought he’d be front and center.
Takeaway: WF’s stuck in the past—asset cap, “restoring trust,” regulators up their a-s. Same old song: it’s holding back NII, so they’re chasing fees—credit cards, Volkswagen auto lending, maybe investment banking (but John Weiss is retiring, so it’s a long slog). No home lending talk, nada on AI or digital banking like last call—just maintaining the fee grind. Tech? They’re spending, but it’s been a mess forever—remember those outages? MS says they’re “building it right” now, no extra risk. Sure.
Stock tanked early, rose after MS tackled the Q&A—guess clarity helped. They’re obsessed with the asset cap—Charlie’s dreaming of “degrees of freedom” once it’s gone (layoffs incoming?). Fee focus—cards, wealth, underwriting—is their lifeline, less “BS” NII reliance. Forward curve? They all laughed it’s always wrong. (AI note: it’s the market’s guess at future rates—WF thinks it’s bunk, betting on their own path.) Call dragged with regulatory dribble—five consent orders down, yay—but no future spark. CS on CNBC later mumbled something impenetrable.


Mike Santomassimo’s on CNBC’s Money Movers now, post-earnings call, and he’s all praise—teams crushed it, solid performance across the board. Been pouring cash into every business, seeing “lots of growth”—some loan upticks (C&I, auto stabilizing, per call), credit’s rock-solid, customers still in good shape. NII missed, though—CNBC’s harping on it. Guidance unchanged, but MS dodged the “why” like a pro—says it’s tough to match consensus with rates flip-flopping daily. “Look at long-term rates,” he pivots, “growing economy!” Consumers keep spending, cash balances are fine, no pullback yet.
Recession odds? Higher than a few weeks ago—things moving fast, he admits. Equity markets are a rollercoaster; M&A and IPOs need that volatility to chill. Begging the Fed to ditch the asset cap—WF’s ready to roll if regulators play nice. MS keeps it chill: “We focus on what we control, not the Fed.” Credit’s tight, customers sturdy—deflects guidance gripes with a shrug. CNBC hosts looked jittery—NII miss stung—but MS soothed ‘em. Stock’s up, 60.09 to 61.12 by end of show. Guy’s got a knack.

by
| 1719 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jrjsndnw

8 replies (most recent on top)

@ap+1jrjsndnw

"The San Francisco bank", lolz.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1jrjsndnw

Yes, Mike, you're great. We get it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1jrjsndnw

@at+1jrjsndnw

Awww...can't cut it as an FA on Long Island anymore? You can check out Northwestern Mutual.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1jrjsndnw

Why would any financial advisor work for Wells Fargo with amount of regulatory overhang. Clients, both prospective and otherwise read the news, so sales will always be difficult. Why sabotage your success with a subpar firm? That's a good reason never to use Wells Fargo financial advisors. They have poor judgment. Shut the firm down already.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jrjsndnw

Wells Fargo, the San Francisco bank, posted first-quarter earnings of $1.39 a share, beating analysts’ estimates of $1.23. Net interest income fell 6% from a year earlier. CEO Charlie Scharf said Wells Fargo expected “continued volatility and uncertainty” and was “prepared for a slower economic environment in 2025.” The stock fell earlier in the session, but reversed those losses and rose slightly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1jrjsndnw

Considering joining WF. Should I not? Looks like layoffs are coming ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jrjsndnw

Who cares. Most of us plebs are not compensated with RSUs. The stock can go to zero for all I care. It only matters to the crooks in the C-suite who have lavished themselves with copious amounts of stock-based compensation while giving the rank-and-file 1% bonuses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jrjsndnw

Post a reply

: