There are many people here that want to be laid off
Others are relatively satisfied but then they are layed off.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to allow people to bought out to leave?
This would reduce risk by allowing an orderly transfer of knowledge.
7 replies (most recent on top)
You are looking at this the wrong way. Drain this company's resources by taking as much expensive training, onsite services, and anything other items they offer. Leave for another opportunity once you get tired of this bank.
They will never do this. All the "wrong" people would leave. Quixotically, HY-paid consultants also often pick.the wrong people to downsize.
FFS poster - layed? Did you fail third grade?
I’d take a buy out or severance if it they allowed volunteers. But they kind of don’t need it. They seem to be chugging alone just fine with swinging the axe.
Plus they want to control who leaves.
OP should be CEO with this new profound idea that's never been mentioned
Maintaining the current environment of confusion and chaos, team mates are leaving w/o severance saving some expenses for CS and his cronies / minions. I’d like to see the overall actual savings from the layoffs based on the 5 years since it was adopted as the go forward strategy.
That would give control over the attrition to the employee. You can probably guess why the company wouldn’t want that.