Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

60 days?

Does WF give people a 60 days “ heads up” to avoid sending a WARN notice ? I’ve never seen something like that at other firms

by
| 1725 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jt6k0sqe

12 replies (most recent on top)

some states have a 90 day requirement - NY for sure, there is another state but can't recall which one.

Re location strategy, you are "notified" that you have the option to relocate or will be severed, and are given 30 days to provide your answer. if your answer is that you won't relocate, you are given official notice of termination - 60 days, unless in a 90 day state. So in effect you get 90 days notice, but technically at the 90 day mark you aren't being notified of actual termination, you're being notified of your choice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ke+1jt6k0sqe

Used to be called the “30 30”
30 days “notice” for termination, the 30 days to use HR resources, resume services, copiers, faxes… all for getting another job, either back with the company or outside. Oh, and we used to have a pool program for internal jobs during the severance time, too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fq+1jt6k0sqe

60 days is the heads up. Although I have heard from at least one person that if you're going to laid off due to location strategy, you might get a 90 day notice. I'm not sure if they keep working the whole time or do the 30 day working, then 60 day non-working.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dn+1jt6k0sqe

as others have said... the 60 days IS the WARN notice. that is your "heads up". You are an employee for 60 days after you are told.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dm+1jt6k0sqe

Real reason is to stay clear of state level notice periods the longest of which is 45 days in California. Although they ask you to sign the displacement paperwork day one you are still "working", even though you are home, and you can rescind that signature and sue. A wait period is required by almost all states. After that period you can not say you signed the paperwork under duress thus negating it's validity. This was common during the great recession in 2008-2010 and was upheld by many state courts. Since you are still an employee for 60 days that is your opportunity period. It was 30 days on site working and 30 days non working until they got concerned about possible damage a displaced team member could cause.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @da+1jt6k0sqe

Stop with the “firm” garbage. I worked for WF for almost 24 years and nobody was saying firm until Charlie started dragging in all the Chase Bank sycophants

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bq+1jt6k0sqe

Having had to work that 60 days at another large financial institution I was laid off from, I’d say take the non working notice with a smile

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1jt6k0sqe

Interesting, I’ve worked at other large banks before and I’ve never seen this notice period. Usually just here is your severance and see you later

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jt6k0sqe

The 60 days IS the notice period of a WARN notice. Also, as someone stated below, company and size of layoff also matters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jt6k0sqe

I'd also add to my last statement that by keeping them on the books for 60 days you increase the chance of them finding a new job before the end of the notice period which saves you from having to pay them severance

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jt6k0sqe

they are still required to give warn notice in many cases which in most states is 60 days, this doesn't circumvent that, it just allows them to do so in a way that doesn't give people a heads up. If you may someone off chances are they may be a little discruntled so rather than keep them working for 60 days and risk them doing something nefarious, you cut off their access and send them home. lots of companies handle large layoffs this way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jt6k0sqe

Required based on the company size and layoff totals

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jt6k0sqe

Post a reply

: