Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Industry standard

The phrase it’s “industry standard” has been heard by me in two instances. The first example was when I was told I needed to take two consecutive weeks off so that Wells Fargo could monitor if I was doing fraudulent activity. The second example, I was told, because I am a vice president I have to now give Wells Fargo a 30 day notice prior to leaving the bank.

by
| 1807 views | | 15 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jwzy2z7w

15 replies (most recent on top)

Moral of the story, don't EVER be a VP for WF. Ask for a do over.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ky+1jwzy2z7w

@ed I think there’s a big difference between one week required and two

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kf+1jwzy2z7w

@eh Yes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ke+1jwzy2z7w

It's the overpaid executive version of "yeah Mom, but everyone else is doing it!" It's a rallying cry for mediocrity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f3+1jwzy2z7w

For the required two week leave, do you have to use your PTO?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eh+1jwzy2z7w

@dk goldman’s, citi, jpm, b of a. Some global banks require employees who have no access to sensitive data to be out a minimum of 5 consecutive days. It’s strongly urged by regulators.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ed+1jwzy2z7w

When I joined it felt like WF was a community bank. Big banks have these requirements. We are a big bank and WF is starting to act like it -finally. The good ole days had a great deal of mismanagement and changes were necessary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ec+1jwzy2z7w

“but does follow other firms in the industry “
Name two banks that do this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dk+1jwzy2z7w

if you have an office title VP or above then it applies to you. Chances are if you didn't get the email last week then it doesn't apply to you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1jwzy2z7w

Is this new notice period for everyone?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1jwzy2z7w

The 2 week off audit requirement should have been disclosed to you when hired for the position. Lots of areas in WIM supervision have this requirement. Nothing new.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1jwzy2z7w

The required 2 weeks off if a Finra audit requirement for any associated person who oversees transactions. Not a wells rule.

The new notice rule is a wells policy but does follow other firms in the industry due to (higher level) employees jumping ship to other firms.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1jwzy2z7w

30 day notice is a load of cr-p.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jwzy2z7w

as an executive director (high level IC) I have to now give 60. I've seen such standards for actual officers. but our office titles mean nothing here and are tied to job title in most groups and have no basis in reality. This company likes to through the term around as a way to justify their decisions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jwzy2z7w

Post a reply

: