Thread regarding Ford layoffs

CR says "NO" to Explorer

Don't worry, EV's will make everything better.

Consumer Reports came up with its list of the top 10 most and least reliable vehicles using data from its owner survey, which contains information on over 300,000 vehicles. The organization takes a look at 17 different common problem areas including everything from powertrains to interior quality, weighs the severity of each problem, and then creates a predicted reliability score ranging from 1 to 100. Otherwise, the only stipulation is that a model must have at least two model years of availability to qualify for the list.

When the scores were tabulated, the Ford Explorer finished with a predicted reliability score of just 16 out of 100, with the main trouble spots being its transmission, power equipment, body hardware, steering, suspension, in-car electronics, noises, and leaks. The Explorer ranks behind every other vehicle in its class – save for the Kia Sorento and Nissan Pathfinder, which both recorded reliability scores of 5 out of 100.

Making matters worse, predicted reliability hasn’t improved by much for the Ford Explorer over the past three model years, with both 2020 and 2021 recording the worst possible overall reliability metric. For the 2022 model year, things improved slightly, but the long-running crossover still trails most of its competition by a significant margin.

We’ll have more insights like this to share soon, so be sure and subscribe to Ford Authority for more Ford Explorer news and non-stop Ford news coverage.

by
| 1195 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k4ZWA18

10 replies (most recent on top)

You don't make major changes to any vehicle or manufacturing process. You make incremental changes. Why? Because every change effects the whole process and you spend too much time root causing problems. Nothing new here it's called continuous improvement where you design a process and when you discover a problem you fix it so you have a predictable spc process. That is what honda and toyota does, and with sooo much less complexity. Hire me back at double what i was paid when i left ford and allow me to actually do my job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rln+1k4ZWA18

Why were there so many engineeing changes on Explorer? Sounds like someone didn't do their homework until after the pencils went down and it was too late to proceed without changing work already in progress.

Poor systems and integration engineering costs money.

Too many suppliers are awarded contracts while the ES is still being developed. That is always going to work against PD. Purchasing will take advantage of this fact and source the most incapable supplier that has the lowest cost. It is literally their job.

Don't hate the supplier. Make better specs that clearly and completely communicate the requirements. Keep changes to a minimum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qym+1k4ZWA18

Found On Road Dead used to refer to our vehicles. Now it refers to our customers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vwu+1k4ZWA18

main trouble spots being its transmission, power equipment, body hardware, steering, suspension, in-car electronics, noises, and leaks.

Well alrighty then, what actually in this era of Explorer is actually functioning properly and reliably??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oyv+1k4ZWA18

@qhl+1k4ZWA18
Baumbick is better qualified to be CEO of Ford than Farley is or will ever be. At least Baumbick is an engineer. Farley is a marketer. You cannot market your way out of engineering issues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hjf+1k4ZWA18

“Main trouble spots being its transmission, power equipment, body hardware, steering, suspension, in-car electronics, noises, and leaks.”

Ecto-1, that you?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qng+1k4ZWA18

Joe Hinrichs took the fall for quality and reliability, Baumbick is being set up to fail, Farley hates him and wants him out so he doesnt challenge his authority. Bad decisions, no decisions and so much more enabled Farley to step in when Hackett got cut ( as well as sucking up to Alexandra Ford!!! ) Unlike Honda or Toyota, Ford eliminates older workers to save a few dollars and rarely promotes from within. Toyota nurtures their talent, same guy has been chief engineer for Camry for over 2 decades. Nepotism is the norm at Ford. Lots of empire building, which is what JF is doing with the continued elimination of pension eligible workers, heart breaking but your days are numbered. Plenty of fakes have joined Ford, take a look at Ford Next. Lots of losers from HP, GM, FCA and the biggest loser from Renault that havent accomplished anything leading to profits. Farley has epic tirades and Next will bear the brunt. Lots have been moved to other orgs and who's left are quiet and unfocused. Not looking good at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qhl+1k4ZWA18

When will someone, anyone, be held accountable for Ford’s abysmal quality? There should be terminations with names sent to the Free Ford Press for publication.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jwx+1k4ZWA18

When I joined Ford Explorer was profitable and something the company was truly proud of.

It's amazing a company like Honda can keep improving their vehicle lines with small changes every year but Ford cannot do the same.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gyt+1k4ZWA18

Main trouble spots being its transmission, power equipment, body hardware, steering, suspension, in-car electronics, noises, and leaks.

It’s not a new platform and we have been making vehicles for 100+ years.

Embarrassing that no one in leadership cares enough to fix the reliability issues.

Expecting more from fewer on the team is not the way to (nor is just having fewer customers as they move to other brands.)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ldi+1k4ZWA18

Post a reply

: