PG essentially told the world we'd rather fire our chairman of the board then let go of any precious DEI employees. Down with the filthy capitalist!
10 replies (most recent on top)
Another result of ESG, congratulations! Fools.
There is no objective performance management in Intel. Performance management is more of a convenience (or inconvenience)
If I was chairman of the board when the new CEO was hired I would do more then step aside... I would apologize to employees, customers and shareholders and then I would give back all the shares I had received and I would resign. It seems like the very least you would do.
Everybody knows Intel strategy and execution is to blame and DEI is just icing on the cake. Of course DEI is stupid. DEI policies that promote based on immutable characteristics instead of meritocracy are nothing more then tribalism.
If you run the statistics on those who have been laid off, you may find that the DEI's were underrepresented (meaning they were not let go). So, are we to believe that DEIs are more valuable and/or in jobs that were not eliminated? I would laugh at anyone would try to make such an absurd argument. Convince me I'm wrong.
Meritocracy is dead at $INTC
I'm very the sure OP is one of the incompetent people that would rather look at others to talk sh-t about rather than how his lack of value-add has made him scared of being fired.
OP does not understand what "capitalist" means.
Do your own fact checking instead of listening to BS. Omar Ishrak will still be a member of the board, just not the chair.
Really, you cried about that...BS (and I don't mean Bob S)
Yeah - what are you talking about? And which "DEI" employees are you referring to? Incompetence and "DEI" are not the same thing.
He did? What are you referring to?