Thread regarding Oracle Corp. layoffs

REPOSTING -- Oracle Unbreakable Security!! Microsoft walked away from leasing Oracle data center over security concerns!!

Sorry for the repost. Oracle brags about being a "security" company. They just laid off some of the best security experts in the industry. Oracle Unbreakable Security!!


Microsoft walked away from leasing Oracle data center over security concerns!!
https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-was-in-talks-to-lease-oracle-compute-capacity-2026-6?op=1

Microsoft was recently in talks with Oracle about leasing the company's cloud infrastructure, but the deal fell through due to security and compliance concerns, according to people familiar with the matter.

One of the people said that the deal could have been worth more than $3 billion.

The failed talks highlight a growing reality of the AI bo-m: even the world's largest technology companies are running short on computing power. As demand for AI services soars, cloud providers like Microsoft are increasingly competing not just for customers but for the infrastructure and capacity needed to run their own products.

That scramble is driving an unusual wave of partnerships, capacity-sharing agreements, and multibillion-dollar infrastructure deals as companies race to secure enough computing resources to support the next generation of AI.

Microsoft recently projected that its capital expenditures for the 2026 calendar year will reach $190 billion, largely to expand data center capacity. The company has already turned to Amazon to add capacity for its GitHub code development business to address recent outages.

Microsoft is seeking a deal or deals with other cloud providers to prioritize its own Azure cloud computing resources on customers, the people said. "We are shopping for capacity everywhere," one of the people said.

The plan was to move some Microsoft workloads to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, but Oracle's public cloud did not have the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP), a standardized security framework that ensures cloud services are secure enough to handle U.S. government data. Oracle was not willing to add this framework, one of the people said.


by
| 848 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kvxqtkww

5 replies (most recent on top)

@be proof read what you write... you sound ignorant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c9+1kvxqtkww

To be fair, Oracle has FedRAML is Oracle Gov tenancies. Microsoft didn't want to put it there and asked to be on Public cloud. That was the deal breaker

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1kvxqtkww

tomato, tomato

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1kvxqtkww

@ah,
No, it's because they can't meet the stringent security requirements of FedRAMP. Still a legacy mindset behind too many legacy technologies in the stack. Add the bureaucratic miasma on top and you get the inability to be compliant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1kvxqtkww

As per the article it's because Oracle has decided not to implement FedRAMP. So who cares? The honchos decided that segment isn't interesting to us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1kvxqtkww

Post a reply

: