Thread regarding Cengage layoffs

Merit Increase

I am in the higher ed dep, so we usually get "significant impact" merit increase equating to 3.25% of salary regardless of performance. Has this percentage changed for this year? I guess we will find out from our next paycheck.


by
| 958 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kw261xwt

11 replies (most recent on top)

Budget was tight this time around due to IPO and severance pay-out for laid-off employees. They couldn't say that part out loud. What a shame. Hence, the lower % merit increase.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @150+1kw261xwt

Another great AQ from last Friday

I'm curious why we call it "merit increase" if the compensation is capped at a certain percent at the organizational level? It is highly demoralizing to have invested highly in the company and contribute to increases in growth markets but still receive an "adequate" level of merit. I can handle the conversation that the company can't afford to increase everyone's salary, but it is a lot harder for me to stomach "you did above and beyond your job description, but you didn't do enough to warrant recognition of that in a way that sticks with your workday"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11e+1kw261xwt

@w5 okay, so they reduced the significant impact % this year. Not shocked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wd+1kw261xwt

@OP in the US & UK, the 'significant impact' % this year was between 2.25% and 3% depending on which quartile of your salary band you're in. Lowest quartile gets 3%, highest 2.25%. I'm pretty sure last year it was 3-4%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @w5+1kw261xwt

@c8 - since I started working here, I have received a "significant impact" % multiplied by the quartile in which my salary falls within my salary range. So they did something similar then.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qw+1kw261xwt

@bw literally couldn’t have said it better myself. Nailed it all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e4+1kw261xwt

@ad “In FF, they mentioned 2.5% percent which is what lot of people got I think. Cost of living is 2.8% by the way.”

It confused me that they said this. I got 3.5% and know a few others who got 3-4%. Again, just zero transparency here because they definitely said 2.5% was the “top end”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c8+1kw261xwt

@ad It's telling how much MH was unprepared for this pushback. Or any pushback, really. Shouldn't someone on his team have told him it was a possibility? I mean, B isn't there to skillfully guide MH and kiss his b-tt anymore, and the new girl is new and probably doesn't want to tread on his toes.

But the surprise! His complete floundering when trying to explain the it was a merit increase but really a cost of living increase and really it's our fault for not meeting impossible standards with less staff and higher goals!

I don't think he was just "uncomfortable for 30 minutes"; I think he was MAD MAD MAD and heads will roll or at least get shouted at.

Plus, the lack of music at the beginning of the call meant that no -sskissers flooded the chat or Slack with woos and I love this song as much as I love Cengage. Love to see it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bw+1kw261xwt

I cant believe he had the nerve to say he wants to pay more than the competition but then ranted about all the reasons he won’t - mainly blaming us and saying we need to bring in better results. He’s lucky he gets the results he does after years of inconsistency and revolving door of changes and zero innovation. Really speaks to the stellar team doing a lot with nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1kw261xwt

wow 2.5% is a terrible number. i guess people might consider you lucky if you're still getting a paycheck. but it has been between 3-4% at cengage for the last few years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kw261xwt

Post a reply

: