I would have thought that air quality being in the hazardous range would have been justification to work from home but I reckon not.
13 replies (most recent on top)
@ae You don't have an air conditioner? 🤡
Is this a summer interns group chat? Some real serious discussion going on here.
@br Tastes like chicken.
I think the BH bathrooms' air is more toxic than outside.
@br says the person who is petrified of smoky air. "I HAVE ASTHMA"
Every office that does not have tax credits or cannot reach their tax credit requirements should be work from home. At least then I would be able to hear my coworkers instead of the conversations of dozens of people who sit around them. I don't know how anyone gets anything done with all that noise.
If you were working outdoors all day, I'd understand your complaint. Do you work outdoors all day? Or are you just finding reason to bish?
if the merchants need to work the stores or the banks need to open doors for business, you can get your a-s to the office
@a6 my point is that management should allow people in areas where the AQI is hazardous you stupid stupid mark.
@a5 not as much as you for using bad air to say you can't possibly be expected to walk outside a minute to your car vs. the people who actually have to work outside today. Entitled beyond imagination.
@a2 so because you say people spend more time outside when they WFH they would just choose to be outside in hazardous air?
Are you mental?
@a1 not when the AQI is 614!!!
Lets be honest - people spend more time outside when WFH than they do when in the office