Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Its been 5 years since Janet Yellen imposed a 2T asset cap on the bank - the most severe punishment in history

Has the bank improved since the asset cap was first imposed?
If so how?

Leave your comments below.

The bank’s workforce was at 238,698 on Dec. 31, down 511 employees, from the third quarter. The year over year reduction is 10,737, or 4.3%. Since fourth-quarter 2020, the headcount is down by nearly 30,000, or 11%

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-02/wells-fargo-hoped-fed-sanction-would-be-brief-today-it-turns-5#xj4y7vzkg

https://journalnow.com/business/local/wells-fargo-acknowledges-asset-cap-to-last-into-2024-share-repurchases-may-resume-in-first/article_c6b86004-951f-11ed-b6a4-0b705651a895.html

When regulators hit Wells Fargo & Co. with an unprecedented cap on growth, executives atop the bank expressed confidence they could get it lifted in a year or so. Today marks its fifth birthday.

The unexpectedly sticky cap on assets has become the industry’s most-dreaded punishment. Janet Yellen made it her final act as Federal Reserve chair in early 2018 — a moment that’s been compared to the final scene of The Godfather. Wells Fargo can’t escape until it completes a grueling internal overhaul to address past scandals. 

by
| 1966 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1l4gsA8d

13 replies (most recent on top)

From a few years back….

It happens elsewhere, but without the crushing regulatory activity.

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/cfpb-investigating-bank-of-america-over-phony-accounts

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lml+1l4gsA8d

Yeah, WF did nothing wrong!

Oh, wait...ran a big ol' organized crime ring for years because eight is great and eleven would be heaven.

The real crime is that there were no perp walks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ohq+1l4gsA8d

Let’s be real it’s number 2. Wells is the poster child for big banks at this point. If they actually treated all banks equally, regulators and congress would have to deal with financial industry lobbyists which they don’t want.

That story where BOA overdrafted a significant amount of customer accounts came today and went tomorrow. No breaking news or anything. If it was Wells, we would’ve had 15 consent orders by end of day.

We as a bank aren’t perfect but we aren’t that far off compared to other institutions. We were giving an asset cap that could only be resolved through a fools mission…become an ethical financial institution. That’s literally not possible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yve+1l4gsA8d

One of two possibilities. 1. Chuck is inept at his job to turn the bank around. 2. The bank is wrongly being targeted with these asset caps.

LOL, who are we kidding, it's #1 and this $hitHole has always had ethics issues. From poor leadership-driven incentive plans and mandates down to bank tellers feeding Mortgage flunkies customer data in exchange for under the table comp. Combine that with internal folks getting family members to open accounts they didn't need to make the numbers. You wouldn't believe what we can see from this side of the IT backroom on how shifty mortgage is.

The good news. I've gotten a better job like a month ago and asked for some time prior to start so I could collect the annual goodies and leave my cr---y leadership with a day of notice. 2 weeks? LOL. I'll follow the law like this company does. LMAO!!! If asked to testify on what I've personally seen behind the scenes on this bank, I'd gladly do it for free.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yjh+1l4gsA8d

There has been zero improvement. It has only gotten more dysfunctional as more and more east coasters have been brought in from the other banks where they could not succeed

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oxe+1l4gsA8d

The fact that it has been in place this long speaks to sheer incompetance of the leadership of WF and its board. Five years with no end in sight because the bank keeps constantly fu----g up.
At this point, the bank should be broken off and sold into manageable pieces that other better run places can handle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @irc+1l4gsA8d

The board can get rid of Charlie, or the cap. Their choice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tkl+1l4gsA8d

The billions spent on stock buybacks could easily have been spent on the remediation necessary to lift the asset cap and cure all consent orders. Hubris and incompetence are the only barriers to moving past this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vmz+1l4gsA8d

"Corporate Recidivist" cap is appropriate. The end.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uux+1l4gsA8d

I was in a small group meeting w/ the former CFO - the one who looked like Bill Murray. He was great! Super smart, very charming, self-effacing. He’d make a great neighbor and was really good at his job.

He was confident we could overcome the cap. On paper and in practice. On paper they already had some strategies to get around the limitations of the cap. In practice getting it removed has outlasted the creativity of the paper play. I don’t think anyone expected it to be in place 5 years later, including Yellen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oup+1l4gsA8d

The waiting for it to go away by itself strategy isn't working.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @clp+1l4gsA8d

thus ushered in a great era of executives selling off lines of business and playing a shell game on the balance sheet to keep within the cap

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wgj+1l4gsA8d

The true purpose of this move:

Janet Yellen is now serving in Biden’s cabinet.

Congratulations JY, at all of our expense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fzk+1l4gsA8d

Post a reply

: