Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Happy Customers? Yet another lawsuit for Ford.

Gave customers a drain tube to fix, felt like a shaft.

Ford Authority: Last June, a lawsuit was filed by a handful of 2021 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator owners after those vehicles were recalled for underhood fires, and later amended after those owners found Ford’s fix for that issue to be inadequate. Then, this past November, The Blue Oval issued recalls for 2021-2023 Ford Bronco Sport and 2020-2022 Ford Escape models equipped with the turbocharged Ford 1.5L I-3 EcoBoost engine after it found that a fuel injector may crack and leak fuel inside the engine compartment, which could cause a fire as well. To fix the problem, Ford instructed dealers to update the engine control software to include fuel injector leak detection and install a drain tube. However, that didn’t go over well with some, and now, a lawsuit has been filed over this issue, too.

The lawsuit – filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan – claims that FoMoCo violated consumer protection laws by selling vehicles equipped with faulty fuel injectors that can cause spontaneous fires and subsequently neglected to implement an appropriate fix. Thus far, 54 fires have been reported in affected Ford Escape and Bronco Sport models, with 17 of those incidents confirmed to have been caused by a cracked fuel injector.

Plaintiffs in the case allege that Ford knew or should have known about this defect before the vehicles ever went to market, and that it took steps to deliberately conceal the defect. Once Ford did issue a recall, the lawsuit claims that the automaker failed to provide its customers with any sort of meaningful solution, leaving them with vehicles that pose serious environmental and safety hazards.

“An automaker’s number one priority should always be safety,” said Steve Berman, managing partner at Hagens Berman. “A defect that results in fire is intolerable and once Ford became aware of fires, Ford should have made full disclosure of the fire risk before selling any more cars or just stopped selling. Ford’s response to the fallout of this dangerous defect is inadequate. Ford can’t just add a hose to divert fuel out to the ground and call that a fix for a faulty fuel injector. It had a responsibility to respond immediately and be transparent with consumers as soon as it became aware of reports of fires. Instead, it chose to hide the truth from its customers and flout the terms of its own warranty.”

by
| 2033 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lgGISiL

6 replies (most recent on top)

https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/butler-county/west-chester/west-chester-police-cruiser-bursts-into-flames-insurance-company-sues-ford?_amp=true

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5fwd+1lgGISiL

@1eie:

Dear College Hire,

I am writing you in regards to your previous post entertaining the idea a Battery Electric Vehicle may never experience "technical challenges" such as thermal events, due to the lack of certain combustion engine components in BEV's.

I would like to use this opportunity, to entertain a different view on the issue. Any technical device handling high-density energy may experience - as a result of technical flaw - a thermal event, such as certain batteries of certain electric trucks of a certain brand.

Thank you, dear college hire, for your continued attention in keeping things the Ford way.

Kind regards,

Your haunting conscience

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4bmo+1lgGISiL

Post ID: @pub+1lgGISiL

No. The obvious solution is electrified mobility with BEV transportation only. Fuel injectors and fuel for that matter not even needed.

Ford+ Plan company wide transformation will achieve this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1eie+1lgGISiL

When customer buys car ford should have them signs waver that they know they are buying junk and if they go through with the purchase you can’t sue ford and you acknowledge your buying shiittt quality

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xzb+1lgGISiL

Yes the obvious solution always escapes Ford (like IDK installed a better made and more durable fuel injector) because they have brow beaten so many suppliers over the years no one wants to work with them or help them address issues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pub+1lgGISiL

No offence to shade tree mechanics, but, the fix sounds like something one would do. I couldn't believe that was Fords approach to this issue. Besides the continued potential for further fires, fuel omits hydro carbons into the air.

Isn't the evil petroleum alone why EV's are being crammed down our throats? What's next, install a catalytic converter on the drain tube?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uct+1lgGISiL

Post a reply

: