Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

What's up with the recent retirements of VP's under Legg? Retirement really?

by
| 3451 views | | 18 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lgHwGVa

18 replies (most recent on top)

Getting execs to “retire” is the only way to make room for younger less expensive leaders to move up. Trust me, they are not getting rid of the position, just the people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2spx+1lgHwGVa

they got in the cesspool and got their millions and now are leaving the sinking ship.

vps don't care they just take the loot from the company and leave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bak+1lgHwGVa

Execs think Legg’s org owns all systems and they don’t. double digit millions being spent year over year for Ace tower poles and more … never occurred to anyone that there’s duplicative systems all over - sad people lost jobs bc Accenture gets paid to do all the work.
Wishing all that lost jobs in this org the best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zmi+1lgHwGVa

Good start, AT&T needs to seriously flatten it's hierarchy just a tad bit since it's way too top-heavy! That would save a fortune in annual salaries not to mention get rid of a lot of unnecessary redundancy in the food chain!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qsl+1lgHwGVa

meet the new boss, same as the old boss

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1afi+1lgHwGVa

The VP’s who retired
Kristy Dryden
Jacob Feinstein
Nataly Kremer

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kln+1lgHwGVa

Nataly should have been shown the door years ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ele+1lgHwGVa

Nataly Kremer (sp?) is leaving or has left as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nbm+1lgHwGVa

It doesn't matter which of them leaves. There are virtually no visionaries at AT&T because a visionary could never rise up in the ranks of this company. It just isn't that type of company. No innovation really. Just gradually plodding which is why the stock is lower now that it was 20 years ago. The stock market has literally gone up four fold or more in the same time while T has gone down like 20%. T has a great legacy but hasn't been great for the last 40 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mca+1lgHwGVa

It’s all good. There are way too many xVPs in Legg’s org. The ones retiring are multi-millionaires and will find their way back to milk for more one way or another.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yqs+1lgHwGVa

“2023 will be the known as the year of organizational restructure.”
Nope, every year is that year. T views change as progress…everyone knows it’s isn’t. The longer they can make regular predicatable changes, the longer they can fool the board. Unfortunately, it’s a never ending cycle which leads to the never ending surplus season. Everyone here can count on 90 days of employment, nothing more …ever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fds+1lgHwGVa

which VP's SVP,AVP,RVP,TVP,DVP,BVP,EVP,UVP ..VP title is a scam of overpaid people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qym+1lgHwGVa

Probably just an opportunity to get rid of the dinosaurs who are jaded and don't want to change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qam+1lgHwGVa

They’re just jumping off the Titanic. Nothing to see here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fcb+1lgHwGVa

“Retirement”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rbc+1lgHwGVa

This is just the tip of the iceberg for "retirements".... 2023 will be the known as the year of organizational restructure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @izi+1lgHwGVa

Only one I’m aware of is Bill O’hearn who decided to retire and spend time with his family. I’m 100% sure he left on his own, he is revered by leadership and especially those who work for him. That is extremely rare at this company now, he is one that will be missed sorely. Sadly, many many others in leadership cannot make this claim.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tao+1lgHwGVa

Who has left?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jkz+1lgHwGVa

Post a reply

: