Thread regarding IBM layoffs

Just get rid of anyone with the word Partner in their title

They are completely useless and the business will continue on without a hiccup

by
| 2139 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lnpRUl3

5 replies (most recent on top)

Your wish may come true sooner than you think This is IBM’s partner for China

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/blacklisting-inspur-us-targets-partner-021329467.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8yru+1lnpRUl3

If they are only 1% why are they everywhere like dog $hlt? They waste us field sellers time at every turn and bring no value Hope they all get the axe asap

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yrr+1lnpRUl3

The entire strategic partnerships org - in both technology and consulting

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ycb+1lnpRUl3

The actual number of IBM employees who are associated with “partner” or “alliance” in their titles most likely represent less than 1% of IBM’s total workforce. IBM has cut the channel as much if not more than the direct sales force. The problem with “partner” or “alliance” relationships is it’s fundamentally a commodity marketplace so the margins are substantially lower due to competition. IBM still makes money on these relationships, but not nearly the margins that IBM makes with direct customer relationships. The real question is, is it worth IBM continuing to play in the low margin “commodity” space to possibly gain SW share, or does it make sense for IBM to just sell the channel and its associate HW and services off, knowing that SW sales will come to IBM anyway.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yue+1lnpRUl3

Totally agree. A great place to start and add anyone with Alliances as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rde+1lnpRUl3

Post a reply

: