Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Careerpath - Applied and Ignored? How many?

Anyone had success in filing federal EEO complaints after receiving the dear john letter a day after nominating a job - even when you're clearly qualified at 80% or greater?

If you did not file, why not? Fear of retaliation, reputation, etc?

How many jobs have you applied for on careerpath and never received a single interview?

My guess is this is happening on a wide scale and without employees holding the company accountable, it will continue.

by
| 2388 views | | 22 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lpxoB3Z

22 replies (most recent on top)

The predictable comments posted here suggesting a conspiracy of a deck stacked against you because you lack a certain preferential group (LTGBQ) or align with opinions on diversity, inclusion, etc. are pathetic attempts at deflecting the facts. You’ve lost your job because your number came up….your organization has been asked to reduce headcount and you, like many others, are deemed surplus. If you didn’t get caught in this round, you can anticipation you will probably will be in the future. Regarding CareerPath—one of the tricks of securing interviews and a potential offer is that it’s beneficial to research CP routinely well in advance of rumors of a layoff…like years in advance. When you determine which organizations are hiring and the requirements to obtain a slot, you can then begin to network internally and do the personal work necessary to ‘qualify’. The irony is that CP during major layoffs is typically not valuable for anyone on the surplus list. Once you’re placed there, it’s time to move beyond ATT, and look elsewhere.
Stop looking for reasons to place blame on others and get busy on to your next chapter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qsz+1lpxoB3Z

No one can hold a person from a promotion- period. You boss could ask the hiring manager to look at someone else or give you a bad referral but HR will not allow someone to be held from a promotion. No one is that special here. Everyone is replaceable. However, a supervisor can stop someone from taking a lateral. And that is where the releasability becomes an issue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3bez+1lpxoB3Z

The token interviews are worse. 99% of the postings are filled already and they are just jumping through HR hoops that are required. They have to interview x number and have to post the job for y amount of time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xli+1lpxoB3Z

CP is a joke. I literally watched two people hide in their offices for 10+ years get promoted to Director. Good news for the company they checked.

diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) ideology has come to replace the values of merit, fairness and equality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2osk+1lpxoB3Z

Unless you’re a lgbtqia trans furry, you’re not getting promoted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2grk+1lpxoB3Z

My group interviews a lot of career path candidates. It used to be like others described, but there’s no one left to recommend for open positions. At least no one you’d want your name associated with as a recommendation.

Career path is it.

If you were filtered out, you weren’t qualified. Sorry about that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tcm+1lpxoB3Z

My experience is that if you want a promotion, go to another company. Unless you or your family know and are close friends with a senior executive, you are dating a senior executive's child, a relative works for T who can get you in that position, or have some incriminating evidence on the hiring manager. It's all about nepotism and cronyism. Who you know, but more importantly who knows you.
Like others have said, Career Path is a scam. T just has it as a cover.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kbp+1lpxoB3Z

Career Path is a scam.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pee+1lpxoB3Z

Hiring managers will create the job requisition and solicit those that would be a great fit for the job. Most likely they have done the job or have working knowledge of the new role. Minimum interviews with multiple diverse candidates will be performed, following HR hiring guidelines. That is how the world works peeps. No law are being violated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ocq+1lpxoB3Z

Take a business law class and gain an understanding of what EEO is .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ewv+1lpxoB3Z

As many of you promptly said, these positions are opened for somebody already in mind for that role. Back in 2021, I applied for a position and the Director interviewed me (only one) for an hour and we ended in a positive note. However, after the interview he completely ghosted me and never returned my Q messages or emails about the status. I still haven't received that auto careerpath rejection email though. Many weeks later one of his "person" filled that position. Who knew a senior employee can ghost other fellow AT&T employee who is seeking career growth!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rbz+1lpxoB3Z

Most if not all of those positions have somebody already in mind for the role. Best thing to do, network with other teams and express interest. If something opens up, they will reach out. That’s how I moved to my new team. Previously had applied to dozens and dozens of internal roles and heard nothing. Even roles I was over qualified for. In the end, you need to know the hiring manager and they need to want you bad enough if your current team tries to block you. I’ve been blocked before as well. Good luck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1axf+1lpxoB3Z

The sooner you realize that job postings here are largely already filled before they are posted. The internal process is followed to check boxes only. I’ve seen people promoted that lacked skill, education and respect. It really boils down to who you know…sorry to rain on the parade but the truth hurts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ezs+1lpxoB3Z

there has been a noticeable trend during these layoffs that blacks have been let go at higher rate than their other collegues. hiring and releasing personnel needs to be monitored.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ywv+1lpxoB3Z

What can you complain about? It may suck but there is nothing they can do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iij+1lpxoB3Z

Career path can work BUT!!!!! Read my personal examples.

  1. As a 1st level, I submitted for a 2nd level job & the second level contacted me then called my 2nd level who said I was on special assignment and not releasable. Then my 2nd level told me I was releasable on my birthday - period - once a year. Period.
  1. I submitted for another 2nd level job with a different 2nd level and told the hiring 3rd level manager that I was releasable who contacted my 3rd level for the release date and my 3rd level contacted his 4th level to fire me because - a. it wasn't his idea, b. he couldn't find a replacement for that cr---y Ntwk Op job that I held and c. How dare me go around him. The 4th level saved me, refused my termination & I was moved to a different 3rd line group.
  1. I wound up in a different 2nd level group (as a 1st level a decade later) & needed escape & a promotion + money$$ still! One of my friends was now a 3rd level who had a career path 2nd line job so I call him and expressed interest but had no skill in that promotion job. Within 2 minutes I was not a 2nd level, new job and my stupid boss up thru my old 5th level said no. My new 3rd level was golf buddies with his 6th level a EVP level who said YES! Got that job because of who I - he knew.
  1. If a hiring manager wants you (your dating his daughter, a relative, golf buddy) wants you, he will tell you exactly what you need to list on your resume. You still have a release problem however from you current organization.
  1. Career path is a JOKE unless you meet the Jean Piere check boxes of orientation, gender, color or have incriminating info on some higher mgt level.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ule+1lpxoB3Z
  1. You may have been overqualified.
  2. You didn’t pass the internal reviews either based on degree, education or experience.
  3. You didn’t have skills that were listed as required (you may not even see these they could be part of an internal check).

You will filtered out for a reason.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wgo+1lpxoB3Z

Most postings are already earmarked. Grow up… SMH…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tjf+1lpxoB3Z

You have a better chance filling with your state labor board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hpv+1lpxoB3Z

It is true jobs that are on career path that close and then reopen for specific people. That how I received my job and 2 others I know got there jobs. The hiring manager ask the specific person that he wants for the job to supply a resume. Then the hiring manager puts the jobs skills that specific person has on their resume. So if anyone questions why the hiring of this person instead of someone else. HR and the hiring manager will lie to their face saying "The hired applicant met most of the skill codes required for the job!"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @alt+1lpxoB3Z

You might have a case based on jobs that are filled before they even close on career path. And that has happened.

Or jobs that are on career path that close and then reopen for specific people. If they didn’t bid on the job in the original posting and the hiring manager opens the slot up again, that technically is not equal opportunity. That is admitting that you are looking for a specific person.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yit+1lpxoB3Z

This does not qualify for EEO complaint. Nice try.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iia+1lpxoB3Z

Post a reply

: