Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

5 Days a week in the office coming next

Folks, here is an article that talks about tech companies ending remote work.

We are going to 5 days a week after 3.
3 days is the start. Hold on to you seats, because it’s going to get rough.

Article:
“Tech CEOs threaten to end remote work, infuriating workers hit by mass layoffs and dwindling perks”

By Hasan Chowdhury May 5, 2023, 5:30 AM EDT

“Here's a question tech bosses will have mulled over in recent months: in a year of efficiency, just how far can they go before their workers plot a rebellion?

Companies in Silicon Valley and beyond have let go of workers – 350,000-plus workers have been laid off since 2022, per Layoffs.fyi – while dropping the perks employees became accustomed to in order to save costs.

Sure, workers can live without the free dried mangoes, but the more serious changes that have taken place in a few months are a lot to process for a sector that was consistently riding high during the low-interest-rate years.

Unfortunately for tech workers, the changes might not end there. Speaking at an event by payments giant Stripe on Wednesday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, a key enabler of tech's efficiency era, suggested that "remote work is over" and workers need to get back to the office.

Altman is not alone, of course, as the very companies that introduced the world to remote work are increasingly changing their tone to exercise even more control over their companies amid the turmoil. The backtracking is at their peril.

A shift that could backfire
Many companies in tech have been exploring the idea of shifting away from full remote work for several months. Last August, Apple started to ask workers to return to the office three days per week, for example.

But with the downturn squeezing companies, there is an apparent change in attitude that has changed the polite nudge for workers to get back into the office into an ultimatum, as was the case when Elon Musk scoffed at remote work after taking charge of Twitter.

The suggestion from Altman at the Stripe event was that this tougher approach was important for startups, as "the more unclear and early the product is, the more in-person time the team needs to grind together."

Tech giants, meanwhile, may see in-person work as an easy means of staying on top of worker productivity, particularly as measures of performance such as revenue per employee — a means of understanding exactly how much revenue each employee contributes — come back in vogue.

An Insider analysis of tech giants over the past five years did find that many had become bloated and unproductive. Meta's revenue per employee has fallen 14% over the past five years, for example, as its headcount grew 143% in that time.

It goes some way towards explaining why Zuckerberg suggested in March that revisions to Meta's work-from-home work policy would be coming this summer after analyzing performance data. He said, for example, that early-career engineers tended to perform better when in the office.

But mandates to force workers to return to the office are unlikely to sit well with everyone.

Many workers have found that the option of working from home has given them a degree of freedom that supports their health but allows them to perform at the standard expected of them.

Research seems to support this. Last year, a survey by startup Buffer of 2,000 workers found that 97% said they would like to work remotely at least some of the time for the rest of their careers.

Tech firms taking away this option could face backlash. Stories about worker morale plummeting as bosses force employees back into the office, whether full-time or part-time, are becoming increasingly commonplace.

One worker at a large US insurance firm with more than 40,000 workers recently told Insider that plans to make people work in the office at least two days a week would "boost morale."

On the contrary, worker morale will suffer if managers are seen to U-turn on promises, or at least suggestions, that remote work could be permanent, as was the case at this insurance firm.

Tech firms that championed remote work, but are now back-tracking, may soon have to face a furious reckoning from their beleaguered employees.”

by
| 2275 views | | 7 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1mKli3bs

7 replies (most recent on top)

If a company is stuck with the real estate, then probably, in office. If they lease, then, the increased value of in-person work has to exceed the cost of leasing the office. That would depend on the job and the available means to measure productivity.

That said, with the commercial real estate glut, leasing costs should start coming down. That would make in-office work a bit more attractive to a company than maybe 6 months ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dnc+1mKli3bs

Some of you really don’t get it…we’re not all bi--hing about return to office…return to office isn’t a big deal - 3 days a week, whatever…soon you could maybe get away with 2 (as a developer).

The big issue is forced relocation…it’s basically a wide sweeping layoff that completely ignores performance…which is the d-mbest way to do layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sei+1mKli3bs

Where is ATT’s corporate social and environmental responsibility? Looks like T doesn’t care one iota about all it’s employees driving to/from the office every day and leaving a detrimental carbon footprint! T is so worried about wokeness, but doesn’t care about air pollution or global warming! I thought working from home would reduce both significantly!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bba+1mKli3bs

"Meta's revenue per employee has fallen 14% over the past five years, for example, as its headcount grew 143% in that time."

Meta is a public company, so Zuck has to say something to explain the decline.

Can't admit he hired too many people, so make remote work the scapegoat. Also it's a painful reality that Facebook is your grandfather's Oldsmobile of social media services. People under the age of 30 have moved on. But ok, yes, the 14% drop is because remote workers are slackers. Right.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @guj+1mKli3bs

Going back to the office, IMHO, isn’t a big deal - it’s what most of us did pre-COVID. The force moves and thinly veiled HC reduction sucks though.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pgn+1mKli3bs

During COVID, majority of frontline call center reps chose to WFH. In fact, so many WFH customer service reps were hired to meet demand that there are not enough call center seats to bring them back even if wanted, or centers located where they live. One Mobility Call Center in Tridelphia (West Virginia) is closing this month and all reps have the option to WFH. In Mobility Customer Service, one AVP has 5 directors (L3) managing Area Managers (L2) and Team Managers (L1) who supervise reps across the US, falling under all the different CWA color contracts (e.g. Black contract, Purple contract, etc.).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xps+1mKli3bs

Yelp, go back to the office and work like the rest of the front line people have done since day 1 of COVID

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iwb+1mKli3bs

Post a reply

: