There are people who get work from home exceptions that live within the 40 miles and did not WFH previous to pandemic. They get a magic email informing them of this. Anyone terminated for cause b/c of RTO has grounds for a class action lawsuit. Tread carefully Wells HR.
12 replies (most recent on top)
Please explain how someone’s WFH agreement is disparate treatment. What protected class is being discriminated against?
Sorry to inform the id--t that said you can’t sue Wells Fargo. Wrong!!! I have an attorney ready to go. Disparate treatment is huge. So go look in a law book stupid Unless you are an attorney you know nothing.
Disparate treatment. Period.
If class action won’t work then we still have the union! The union will fix everything for us, more money, no more layoffs, all workers back to USA, free soda , no more RTO, better benefits than Congress! Gooooo Union!
A class action? A good lawyer won’t take this case.
Is it because you don’t like the policy? If true, you will get laughed out of the lawyer’s office.
Is it because some people are treated differently? Here’s a hypothetical scenario where you might have a case: a protected class is forced to work in the office, while others are not. That’s a case.
We are all treated differently by our employers. For instance, we have different salaries based on: education, reviews, experience, revenue performance, management advocacy, cost to replace, geographical area, etc. Every company and industry treats employees differently. That’s not a class action. That’s working in a capitalist society for an “at will” employer.
I understand and appreciate people are angry about RTO, but stop with the baseless “I’m going to sue you” rants. You’re not going to get very far.
Agreed. Remember Wells Fargo annual training taught us what disparate treatment is. Wells Fargo should be sued. They just paid out a $1 billion dollar lawsuit so they are used to lawsuits! Such a d-mb A$s company! FRTO
What’s the point of this chopped word salad post? There are thousands of employees who are remote.
Some within 40, some outside of 40, some because they have an accommodation and some who have a you are special note from their mommy/daddy manager.
I understand those who are remote got an email saying their location would now be listed as remote in the system. They were ALREADY deemed as remote prior to the email. Now HR has a better way to data filter who is remote in CA within 40, outside 40 etc. and if outside 40 they are not assigned a location they’ll never go to. I think it will help WF better drill into categories and potential protected groups across remote so they can refine when and how remotes are up for displacement consideration.
Moans of a DEI hire.
“But we’re all the same!”
Is this supposed to be some bo-b dropping truths here? You seem to equate an employee w/o an exception and one with an exception both not going to the office as equal.
D-mb D-mbs like you make it easy for those with the tiniest slivers of self-awareness to excel in this world.
Grow up and get out
good luck with your lawsuit
I mean...