Unfortunately, this is cr-p is just as bad as before. The only difference is recruiters and hiring managers now are required to provide more documentation which they falsify when they want or need to. I have heard about if from both sides of the curtain and spoken to applicants, recruiters, hiring manager and interview panels. There is no way to independently verify the facts without smart analytics and replay of the interview conversations which can very cumbersome. That’s why whistleblowers need to come forward.
23 replies (most recent on top)
This has to be a joke right? You PERSONALLY have talked to recruiters, hiring managers, applicants, and others and have uncovered corrupt practices? Why are you asking for additional people to come forward? Just convince this vast array of personal contacts who confide in you with information that could cost them their job to share their story with the press.
Here is what really happens ... the HR hiring process is terrible. Recruiters vary in quality from "highly professional" to "extremely incompetent". Hiring managers have a similar range of talent and professionalism. And finally, you have leaders making decisions above the recruiter or hiring manager level that impact job postings. I've been in groups that had open positions and even offers extended where a senior leader immediately closed all open positions. Those offers were rescinded. As an applicant, it can look like HR or the hiring manager is incompetent when in reality they did everything by the book but were impacted by a decision outside their sphere of influence.
People on this board love to throw around "corruption" all of the time. In reality, the most likely culprit in virtually every situation is incompetence.
PLEASE do not come to work here. The psychopaths are off the chain here. You will RUIN your life.
Why aren’t we accelerating layoffs ? RCSA has been a bust despite the fake narrative. Morale is at all time low. Everyone quitting silently. Asset cap is not going to be lifted anytime soon. So let’s just rip the bandaid and breakup this company or aggressively start selling parts of it and be done.
Corrupt is Charlie’s middle name. This company is disgusting.
@lev+1ntaWQkq
Hahaha what a troll,
Feed me evidence that all people on this forum already know about, when given say it's old news, the investigation is still underway is it not??? And the fake interviews did happen, per witnesses inside the bank.
Go back to back to another post and tell us why we need to RTO to prop up the CRE values. I really do wonder how much Wells is paying these people.
You found like one article from a month ago, and that's old news. Gonna have to do better than that!
I agree, more people need to step forward and share their experiences with https://www.eeoc.gov/ and any regulator that will listen. I hear senator Elizabeth Warren is always interested in hearing about Wells Fargo corruption.
Here you go, investigation into WFC hiring and fake interviews, but of course no wrong doing by the company (firm lol)
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/09/business/wells-fargo-fake-interviews-investigation.html
But the company changing and freezing the policy has nothing to do with admitting any wrongdoing lol.
I really hope they are paying you sufficiently to try and put spins on all these posts.
Again, what are these corrupt hiring practices of which you speak? I'd hoped we'd learned some lessons, big picture, about the implications of raising allegations without providing evidence.
That list highlights the pervasive corruption of the organization, anyone that believes it doesn't extend to hiring as well is fooling themselves.
In credit risk if you are not previously from Chase you have no chance. I've seen people with 4 or 5 years of finacial services experience be promoted to senior managers shortly after being hired as individual analysts as they obviously wouldn't be able to compete if the role were posted. One manager who was well respected in our group left due to this exact reason. No way to move up if they don't post the roles and promotions only go to the former JPM people.
I've also been on panel interviews where the panel was told to adjust documentation to give priority to the person the hiring manager wanted regardless. When I refused to do so, they essentially pulled the position, reposted it and used a different set of people for the panel. Amazingly the person was hired, even though their skill set was inferior to others in the interview process.
Of course Wells Fargo isn't corrupt, it's the people that don't get selected that are jaded /s.
That list, while accurate and tragic, has nothing to do with corrupt hiring practices.
To anyone outside, the best advice is don’t apply or work here.
I was strung along too and it looked from what I was told that there were a few roles open and I was a viable candidate. This went on for 6 months for 1 role. What a joke. In the end it just remained open, after additional interviews and ‘tests’ were added. I think the point was the wear people out so that only their favored candidate remained. Totally unethical.
I agree. In general our problems as far from over. That’s why Wells Fargo Chief Control Officer (Nate) just got canned and quit. The culture is corrupt and it’s too big to manage.
For those asking what corruption? Do you have your head in the sand or just another person on the WFC payroll trying to spin a tale of how Wells is not corrupt?
Here is a list from the CFPB just one of the regulators that we deal with
You can find them at crsreports.gov
2016
September 2016: Wells Fargo pays $185 million in fines
to the CFPB, OCC, and the City and County of Los
Angeles for creating about 1.5 million unauthorized
deposit and 623,000 credit card accounts in customers’
names without their knowledge. Wells Fargo also
discloses that it previously fired 5,300 employees for
their involvement in creating these fake accounts.
In coordination with the Department of Justice (DOJ),
the OCC assesses $20 million in civil money penalties
against Wells Fargo for violating the Servicemembers
Civil Relief Act (SCRA; P.L. 108-189). Violations
include failure to accurately disclose servicemembers’
active-duty status to the court prior to evicting those
servicemembers and failure to obtain court orders prior
to repossessing 413 servicemembers’ automobiles. In
November 2017, Wells Fargo admitted it had illegally
repossessed another 450 servicemembers’ cars.
October 2016: Wells Fargo’s chief executive officer
(CEO), John Stumpf, retires. Between forfeiture and
clawbacks, he surrendered $69 million in compensation.
Another key executive, Carrie Tolstedt, surrendered $67
million in compensation. Wells Fargo’s board names the
chief operating officer, Timothy Sloan, as the new CEO.
December 2016: As a consequence of deficiencies in
Wells Fargo’s “living will,” regulators restrict Wells
Fargo’s ability to grow its business. P.L. 111-203 (often
called the Dodd-Frank Act) requires certain companies
to submit a living will to regulators to show how large
banks would unwind themselves in the event of a large
financial loss.
2017
March 2017: The OCC downgrades Wells Fargo’s
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rating to “needs
to improve,” from “outstanding” due to Wells Fargo’s
discriminatory and illegal credit practices, including the
fake accounts scandal.
April 2017: The Sales Practices Investigation Report
(SPIR) issued by Wells Fargo reveals that the bank’s
board of directors and bank executives knew of many of
the issues underlying the fake accounts scandal as far
back as 2002.
July 2017: Wells Fargo admits that it charged about
570,000 customers for auto insurance on car loans
without verifying whether these customers already had
existing insurance. As a consequence, up to 20,000
customers may have defaulted on their car loans.
October 2017: Wells Fargo admits it wrongly fined
110,000 mortgage clients for missing a deadline, even
though the delays were the bank’s fault.
2018
February 2018: The Federal Reserve restricts Wells
Fargo’s growth until it improves its governance and
controls. Wells Fargo announces it will replace four
members of its board by the end of the year.
April 2018: Wells Fargo, CFPB, and OCC reach a $1
billion settlement of issues related to Wells Fargo’s
auto-loan insurance and mortgage practices.
July 2018: Reportedly, Wells Fargo refunded millions
of dollars for charges related to add-on services, such as
pet insurance and legal services, it added onto
customers’ accounts without the customers’ full
knowledge.
August 2018: Wells Fargo pays a $2.1 billion fine to
DOJ for misrepresenting the type of mortgages it sold to
investors between 2005 and 2007. Wells Fargo discloses
that it incorrectly denied loan modifications for 625
people, 400 of whom had their homes foreclosed.
2019
Timothy Sloan resigns as CEO in March, after the OCC
made a rare public rebuke of the bank. Throughout 2019
other key executives leave the company. Charles W.
Scharf becomes the CEO and president in October.
2020
January 2020: The OCC issues lifetime prohibition
from participating in the banking industry and new civil
money penalties (CMPs) to two former senior
executives; John Stumpf ($17.5 million) and Carrie
Tolstedt ($25 million). OCC also issues other
prohibitions or cease and desist orders along with CMPs
to other former key executives.
It is reported that the Treasury Department’s Office of
Inspector General (IG) has been assessing OCC’s
actions in connection with sales practices at Wells Fargo
and expects to release its report sometime in 2020.
February 2020: Wells Fargo agrees to pay $3 billion to
resolve criminal and civil investigations into its past
sales practices to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The
SEC is expected to distribute about $500 million of the
$3 billion to the investors. As part of the settlement,
DOJ has agreed to defer prosecution for three years if
Wells Fargo abides by certain conditions.
So you didn't get the job, so the system must be corrupt, got it.
Elaborate on what's corrupt, please.
The higher ups always get what they want. DEI is the complication that middle and lower managers have to deal with. It is the way of the world and not just what goes on at WF.
Come forward to whom? Investigation has gone nowhere.
You are right. I noticed there was also a recent announcement limiting the number of internal jobs employees can apply for. I guess fabricating documentation is becoming too time consuming..
In most recent years (read after the lawsuit due to fake interviews) Wells has started to go the route of hiring people at individual levels then promoting them into the positions they really wanted them in, bypassing the need for these hires to "compete" for the senior positions. No documentation needed to prove why they were the best candidate etc.
Wells Fargo is corrupt as a whole there are no ethics here and if you set up one rule they will find another way around it to get what they want.
I was completely turned off by the interview process and yes, it does feel corrupt. I never got the offer (paint me jaded I guess) but no question I was strung along, told false information. It was a joke. Actually considering how I formally complain.
In the end, a blessing. Landed a MUCH better opportunity that I would have missed had I joined Wells