Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Anything is possible but these must be done

  1. . Really execute 5in4 and get each node to world class defect density
  2. Change the culture in LTD, FSM and IFS to be truly customer focused and not turf and control drive. As part of customer service deliver whatever the customer wants.
  3. Cut Head count about 30-40K
  4. Make the engineers, GL and PEs and second line really accountable.

Does our BoD, Pat and ELT have what it takes? If not they should all be removed! Intel is too important to fail!

by
| 2933 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1nv0w8qV

9 replies (most recent on top)

Third world company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vil+1nv0w8qV

@1qmg You must be kidding.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1esy+1nv0w8qV

In your list, you put all the burden on the regular Joe Doe, the employee… but ZERO on the ELT… only until the end you suggest getting rid of PG, BoD, ELT… employees execute on the strategy put forth by the leaders. THAT should be point number one: 1. BoD and company in general must make ELT accountable by providing truthful, transparent, and reliable updates on the “strategy”… either it’s the end of the Titanic and everything sinks or tells us progress with data and percentages each month or at least each quarter on how IDM 2.0 is going. The stakeholders deserve no less!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dkk+1nv0w8qV

Intel FSM will survive simply because weather security will demand it.

Whether it is Intel or Nvidia, or others thru IFS it will be propped up.

Pat and most of the ELT and board will be gone and Harvard business case of spectacular failure, but Intel will survive. Of course CCP I’d they change a different outcome is possible. Bit Xi and CCP will own a Taiwan and TSMC within the next ten years.

Pat, BOD and most of the ELT needs to go!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1inw+1nv0w8qV

Too important to fail?

I thought the market decides who wins or loses? The market decides who is important.

Intel should win on meritocracy like it preaches to employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qmg+1nv0w8qV

Somebody needs about 250M x86 client and 10 million or so servers. AMD will take at least half a decade to ramp to the point they can take 50%, Intel has a it of time to pick themselves up.

But Pat isn’t the savior that is sure already. Now the question who will be up for the task when Pat gets the ax in two years

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ywu+1nv0w8qV

Intel is not to big or "important" to fail... unlike its peer corporations in finance who made bad decisions they were still viable companies in their industries just over extended. Intel, on the other hand, has fallen hopelessly behind in process and the designed products aren't what customers need and they cost too much if the do. Think of Intel as a buggy whip manufacturer... products that had a need but the need went away as the world around them moved on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aok+1nv0w8qV

For all that turf and control still a bunch of losers haha

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @now+1nv0w8qV

It's easier for a 70 years old to have a baby than doing this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uyo+1nv0w8qV

Post a reply

: