Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Commrisk article accusing hiding debt

How AT&T Borrowed $10bn from Vendors without Reporting It as Debt

US telco AT&T appears to be an especially big fan of this form of finance, with around USD10bn borrowed in recent quarters using methods it describes as ‘direct supplier financing’ and ‘vendor financing’. Adding such figures to the totals owed to handset suppliers instead of including them in the total for conventional loans helps to generate a more favorable impression of the company’s financial performance. The Financial Times observes:

by
| 1211 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1o7fttGl

9 replies (most recent on top)

Sounds like one of those "Hold my beer" jokes. 'AT&T and a vendor walk into a bar and AT&T says to the vendor, "Hold my beer while I do the horizontal mambo with your girl friend."'

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7cqk+1o7fttGl

Att also likes paying vendors against using employees and becoming more lean.
Vendors are politically neutral thus preferable, despite higher cost
To me it's baffling when I hear talk about savings

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cff+1o7fttGl

“The cost to AT&T of these vendor financing arrangements has exceeded USD4bn in both 2021 and 2022” yikes that’s more than the cost saving initiative

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bhs+1o7fttGl

I think the handset makers are Samsung and Apple to name a few.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kmq+1o7fttGl

Have to love those interest free loans.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yuq+1o7fttGl

I just wet my pants because I heard the word "debt".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1erx+1o7fttGl

Just another classic example of Goliath taking advantage of the little David businesses of the world! If these small business suppliers don't like it, T will always take its business elsewhere!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1csv+1o7fttGl

Jokes on the vendors. AT&T ain’t paying it back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ivq+1o7fttGl

In summary, AT&T borrows from suppliers of handsets, capital assets, and other ‘productive’ assets. AT&T’s handset suppliers were owed USD5.1bn at March 31 under an arrangement where the suppliers are paid interest if AT&T chooses to give themselves additional time to pay. This allows AT&T the option to take up to 90 additional days to pay handset suppliers. The capital and productive assets bought under the ‘vendor financing’ category are acquired through deals where the supplier has given AT&T an extended period to pay (120 days or more) in exchange for a higher gross amount paid. The difference between what AT&T pays under these vendor financing arrangements and the amount they would have otherwise paid is effectively the same as the interest on borrowing the amount owed.

There is nothing technically wrong or immoral in what AT&T is doing. It is interesting because AT&T is getting a significant portion of its finance by making arrangements with vendors that do not involve banks. USD10bn of borrowing is coming from these rolling arrangements with vendors, compared to USD124bn of long-term debt. The cost to AT&T of these vendor financing arrangements has exceeded USD4bn in both 2021 and 2022. To put this into perspective, Verizon only reported USD320mn of vendor financing payments in 2021, and none in 2022 because the total was not deemed large enough to be material to the accounts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ayz+1o7fttGl

Post a reply

: